Choosing the Right Graduate Program for Your NSF Fellowship Application

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhazelm
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When applying for the NSF graduate fellowship, it's important to choose a prospective graduate program that aligns with your research interests and potential mentors, rather than solely focusing on the likelihood of acceptance. Reviewers are more concerned with the quality and feasibility of your project proposal than your chances of admission to a specific school. Listing a dream school is acceptable if your project is compelling and relevant to the faculty there. The acceptance rate for the fellowship is around 20-30%, and there may be quotas for certain demographics and regions. Ultimately, the emphasis should be on presenting a strong, novel research plan that showcases your interests and capabilities.
mhazelm
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I am applying for an NSF graduate fellowship this year. The application requires me to list my prospective graduate program, and describe my project at the school.

What I'm wondering is, what kind of school to list. I have three lists of potential schools - my dream list (the slightly out of my league, but if GRE goes well I could get in), my realistic list (I'm fairly certain I could get in) and my failsafe list (I for sure could get in even if I did badly on the GRE). I don't know whether to shoot for the stars on my NSF application and put my dream school up, or whether I should list something more realistic. I don't want to put down a good school if the reviewers might think "oh, she could never get in there, so we aren't going to award her"... but maybe that's not how the reviewers think at all..

I am just wondering if anyone has any suggestions, advice or comments about this.

Thanks! :cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm bumping this because this will probably turn into the NSF thread. I think it would be useless to try and predict where you're going to grad school right now. I hear the fellowship is very hard to get even if you're already in grad school and have a potential advisor, but then again I have a hard time judging what various people mean by hard. The point of an NSF fellowship is so YOU get the opportunity to pursue YOUR interests independent of a person you rely on for funding. With that stipend you can contract out all sorts of work.

As an aside, I'm considering applying this year, but I'm put off a bit by how much detail they want in the research plan when my area of interest is still pretty large (semiconductor device physics, specifically fabrication, but even that's a huge area).
 
List the schools where you are applying. Your project proposal should be novel/creative, though still feasible. Certainly, there should be some match between potential mentors for such a project and the schools where you are applying, otherwise it won't look very realistic. Otherwise, I'd think reviewers wouldn't worry about your chances of acceptance beyond whether your academic background weakens your application independently of that. Afterall, if you don't get accepted to the programs where you're applying, you're not going to get the money, so that aspect of it isn't really a big concern to them.
 
Do you know if NSF has quotas like granting a minimum number of GRFPs to every university? Also, what is the acceptance rate of the GRFP?
 
Odd to bump this very old thread. The funding rate of the GRFP is something around 20-30%, I believe, but this could be different this year as I believe stimulus money has been added. NSF seems to have quotas for certain groups such as women, as well as giving preference to certain parts of the country (I believe there is a question that asks you to say where you went to high school).
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top