Circular Motion and maximum speed Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a car negotiating a curve with specific parameters. The maximum safe speed for the car on a flat curve with a radius of 45 meters and a coefficient of static friction of 0.50 is calculated using the formula v = sqrt(r * g * μs), yielding a speed of approximately 2.37 m/s. The centripetal acceleration at this speed is determined to be 0.124 m/s². A participant mistakenly converted the coefficient of static friction into inches, leading to confusion in calculations. The importance of using the correct unit for μs is emphasized, as it is dimensionless and should not be converted.
thanlong01
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The problem is like this: It's a beautiful spring day so you decide to take a cruise in your fancy new 1200 kg convertible. While driving, you notice a sign that says "Warning! Flat level curve with radius 45m. Coefficient of static friction for all tires us = 0.50'' With your knowledge of physics:
a) What is the maximum speed that you can safely negotiate the curve (without sliding)?

b) what is your centripetal acceleration at this speed around the curve?

c) What is the angular momentum of your car doing the speed limit around this curve?


The equation sheet is attached.


I tried to solve the problem but i m not sure it's right or not.

Here is my attempt:
a)
Ffriction = m v^2 r
r u m g = m v^2
v = sqrt (r u g)
v = sqrt (45 * 9.8 * 0.0127) //0.0127 -> I converted u from "in" to "meter"
v = 2.37m

b) a = v^2 / r
a = (2.37)^2 / 45 = 0.124 m/s^2

and that what i get so far.. i don't know how to do C
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
thanlong01 said:
Here is my attempt:
a)
Ffriction = m v^2 r
r u m g = m v^2
v = sqrt (r u g)
v = sqrt (45 * 9.8 * 0.0127) //0.0127 -> I converted u from "in" to "meter"
v = 2.37m
μs is a dimensionless coefficient. It has no units. In this problem, μs = 0.50, not 0.50 inches.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top