Circular Permutation problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the number of ways 10 people can sit around a round table with the condition that 3 specific individuals must sit together.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various interpretations of the problem, including whether specific seats are assigned to the 3 individuals or if they can occupy any adjacent seats. There are attempts to clarify the implications of treating the 3 individuals as a single unit and the impact of circular arrangements on the counting method.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with multiple interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest different counting methods and question the assumptions regarding seat assignments and the nature of the round table. There is no explicit consensus, but various perspectives are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity in the problem regarding whether the order of seating matters and how to account for circular arrangements. The distinction between distinguishable and indistinguishable seating arrangements is also under consideration.

dumpman
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


how many ways can 10 people sit around a roundtable if 3 particular people sit together



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


my attempt was (8-1)! x 3!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi dumpman! :wink:
dumpman said:
how many ways can 10 people sit around a roundtable if 3 particular people sit together

my attempt was (8-1)! x 3!

Looks ok to me! :smile:
 
That would only be right if you designate 3 particular seats for the 3 particular people to sit in. I think you have a number of choices for those 3 particular seats.
 
if 3 arent assigned specifically, then the answer is 10C3 x (8-1)! x 3! ?
 
What you can do is think of those 3 as constituting one person. That is, find the number of different ways of seating 8 people rather than 10, then multiply by 3! for the number of ways to seat those 3 people. Oh, wait, that is (8-1)! 3!, your first answer.

Dick, that does NOT require designating "3 particular seats for the 3 particular people to sit in". Or are you suggesting we should multiply by 7!3! by 8 to allow for those 3 being anyone of the original "8" people? I don't believe that is correct.

(I could be wrong, now!)
 
If the question means "order of seating" then I think you are right if 'right' and 'left' partners are distinguishable. If the question means "ways to seat" as in 'the chairs are numbered' then I think I'm right. It is a little ambiguous. I THINK you have to multiply 7!*3! by the number of ways to pick three consecutive chairs in a roundtable. And that's not 10C3, dumpman. They have to be adjacent. But if you think circular rotations are not important you can go with Halls and tiny-tims answer.
 
Last edited:
all seats are equal

Dick said:
But if you think circular rotations are not important you can go with Halls and tiny-tims answer.

Yes, in my experience, "roundtable" questions always mean that the order (clockwise, say) matters, but not the actual seats …

if you're attending a dinner-party, all you're interested in is where you're sitting in relation to everyone else …

on an ordinary table, you could be stuck at the end, which is different, but on a roundtable all seats are equal. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K