Claculate the final speed of a skier who skis down a hill

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the final speed of a skier descending an 80-meter hill with negligible friction, using the kinematic equation v_{f}^2 = v_{i}^2 + 2ad. Two scenarios are analyzed: (a) with an initial speed of 0 m/s, resulting in a final speed of 39.6 m/s, and (b) with an initial speed of 3.0 m/s, yielding a final speed of 39.7 m/s. The analysis highlights that the skier's mass does not influence the final speed due to cancellation in energy equations, emphasizing the Law of Conservation of Energy in solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations
  • Knowledge of potential and kinetic energy concepts
  • Familiarity with the Law of Conservation of Energy
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinematic equations in physics
  • Learn about the Law of Conservation of Energy in detail
  • Explore the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Practice solving similar problems involving energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of energy conservation in real-world scenarios.

lochs
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have an assignment question, it states: Surprisingly little advantage is gained by getting a running start in a downhill race. To demonstrate this, claculate the final speed of a skier who skis down a hill 80-m-high with negligible friction (a) if her initial speed is zero; (b) if her initial speed is 3.0 m/sec. [this final speed found in part (b) is larger than in part (a), but by far less than 3.0 m/sec!]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use this kinematic equation:

v_{f}^2 = v_{i}^2 + 2ad

Compare the two.
 
lochs said:
I have an assignment question, it states: Surprisingly little advantage is gained by getting a running start in a downhill race. To demonstrate this, claculate the final speed of a skier who skis down a hill 80-m-high with negligible friction (a) if her initial speed is zero; (b) if her initial speed is 3.0 m/sec. [this final speed found in part (b) is larger than in part (a), but by far less than 3.0 m/sec!]
For both cases:
{Delta Kinetic Energy} = -{Delta Potential Energy} = mgh = (9.81)(80)*m = (785)*m =
= m*(vf)2/2 - m*(vi)2/2 =
= (m/2)*{(vf)2 - (vi)2}
::: ⇒ (vf)2 - (vi)2 = (1570)
::: ⇒ vf = sqrt{1570 + (vi)2}

Case #1:
vi = 0 ::: ⇒ vf = sqrt{1570 + (0)2} = (39.6 m/sec)

Case #2:
vi = (3.0 m/sec) ::: ⇒ vf = sqrt{1570 + (3)2} = (39.7 m/sec)


~~
 
Last edited:
Thank you
xanthym, your response is a little confusing.. is that potential energy that you're using?

Jameson, i don't get how i'd get a? also would distance be 80 m? and if so isn't that height or are they the same thing?
 
xanthym's right. I just glanced at this question... you don't have enough information to use a kinematic equation.

You know the potential energy at the top, and since their is no kinetic energy yet, you can call this total the total energy.

P.E. = mgh
= (m)(9.81)(80)

It is interesting to note that her mass does not affect this problem, as it will cancel out because it is used in every term.

Look at xanthym's work, and see how using the Law of Conservation of Energy will help you figure out the final velocities.

--------
Jameson
 
Ok so then
its PE=gh since mass cancels out?

this is what i have

KEi=PEi =KEf + PEf
becomes 0 + mgh inital = 1/2mv final squared + 0

v final=mgh inital = 2gh initial

v final= (2gh inital) 1/2

sorry i hope that makes sense.. I'm not sure how to use the latex thing..
 
(2gh + v_i^2)^\frac{1}{2}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
okay i got it =)

thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
12K