Clarification on Partial Derivative Symbols

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on clarifying the notation and interpretation of partial derivatives in a specific homework problem. Participants express confusion about the meaning of various symbols, particularly regarding the relationships between variables like x, y, z, and constants c1, c2, c3. It is highlighted that constants should not be treated as such when taking partial derivatives, as they can still vary with respect to other variables. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context in which these variables are used, especially when they appear in different formats. Overall, the thread aims to demystify the notation and improve comprehension of partial derivatives.
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See uploaded image.

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



I’ve never seen this format so I am not sure what it is asking. Taking L1.B as an example. They are partials, but does it mean partial of x with respect to z? And then partial of y with respect to z? I am pretty sure that part is right after looking at it again.

The one I am really confused about it L1.3D. There are two partial symbols with y and z in front of w. Maybe partial of x then y with respect to w?

And I guess the same thing with C. Partial of c1? Since c is a constant wouldn’t that be zero every time? There is no x with the partial symbols, so I don't think I do anything with the x or y?

I have only seen the following when referring to partial derivatives...

\frac{\partial x}{\partial y}
(partial of x with respect to y)

And...

F_{x}
(partial of x)
 

Attachments

  • L1.3.png
    L1.3.png
    17.3 KB · Views: 495
Physics news on Phys.org
read it as follows:
\partial_x = \frac{\partial }{\partial x}
 
When in doubt, search Google/Wiki ;)! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_derivative

3B. partial of z with respect to x...and partial of z with respect to y.
3C. I'm not sure on this one. I guess partial of u w/ respect to c1, c2, c3, separately.
3D. partial of w with respect to y and then partial with respect to x.
 
Perfect, that is what I was thinking. Thanks for the responses.

Back to the c1, c2, c3... since those are constants, isn't that just going to be zero? Or am I missing something still?
 
erok81 said:
Perfect, that is what I was thinking. Thanks for the responses.

Back to the c1, c2, c3... since those are constants, isn't that just going to be zero? Or am I missing something still?

Why do you think c1, c2 and c3 are constants? If you are taking partial derivatives of them, you shouldn't be thinking of them as constants.
 
Just assume x is not a function of c1, c2, or c3, and go from there.
 
Got it. I guess I am used to c being used as a constant. Plus we just did separation of variables where c1 and c2 where used as constants. With that and the fact that they were before the variables, like most constants, I just assumed that's why they were.

No matter how much I do these, I always get thrown off when different variables get used. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K