Clasical and quantum harmonic oscillator - correspondence principle

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
exponent137
Messages
563
Reaction score
35
At classical harmonic oscillator, total energy is proportional to square of frequency, but at quantum harmonic oscillator, total energy is proportional to frequency.
Are those two frequencies the same?
How it is with transition from quantum harmonic oscillator to classical harmonic oscillator? How omega^1 and omega^2 agree?

One example of this is http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hosc6.html
but where is the frequency?

Maybe I found answer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correspondence_principle
Is this enough?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The next question is:
How more simply to imagine formula W = (n+1/2)ω ?
W is energy ω is frequency and n is integer quantum number.
The common calculation for quantum oscillator is too long for such short result.
 
Does relativistic generalization of quantum harmonic oscillator exist?
Maybe:
http://www.quantumsciencephilippines.com/1811/lowest-order-relativistic-energy-correction-of-1-d-harmonic-oscillator/
 
Last edited: