Classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between classical and quantum interpretations of electromagnetic radiation, particularly focusing on the concept of frequency in relation to photons and radio waves. Participants explore how classical electromagnetic theory relates to quantum mechanics in the context of radio transmission and photon behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the frequency of radio waves produced by an AC current translates into the concept of photons, seeking clarification on the meaning of frequency in this quantum context.
  • Another participant asserts that classical electromagnetic theory is sufficient to understand radio waves without invoking quantum mechanics.
  • A follow-up inquiry asks whether the frequency of a photon represents anything beyond the equation E = hf, specifically if it correlates to oscillations of the electric field within the photon.
  • It is noted that frequency categorizes electromagnetic radiation into bands such as radio, microwave, and x-rays, with specific frequencies corresponding to radio channels.
  • One participant introduces the concept of photons as eigenstates of a Fock space, suggesting that a definite number of photons does not equate to a definite energy or frequency, and proposes that RF antenna states are better modeled as coherent states.
  • Another participant advises against focusing on photons in the context of radio waves, suggesting that understanding electromagnetic waves as a whole is more beneficial, with frequency determining the radio station and modulation affecting audio signals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of quantum mechanics for understanding radio waves, with some advocating for a classical approach while others seek to integrate quantum concepts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of frequency in relation to photons.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the relationship between classical and quantum descriptions of electromagnetic radiation, as well as the definitions of frequency and its implications in different contexts.

Glenn G
Messages
113
Reaction score
12
Hi,
So I can get the idea that the ac current in a radio transmitter produces radio waves of the same frequency of the ac supply, just like shaking a slinky sprung up and down but how does this translate into the radio waves as actually coming out as photons and for that matter other than knowing E = hf (so frequency is linked to photon energy is there any way of thinking about what frequency is in this context? Is it oscillations of the electric field within the photon itself. I've heard that thinking of the photon as a little wavelet i.e. Portion of a longer classical wave isn't useful)

Thanks for any guidance,
G.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need quantum mechanics to understand radio waves. Classical EM is perfectly valid for that.
 
Hi Dale,
Thanks, I just wondered how to resolve what happens though through a quantum model, What does it mean to define a frequency for a photon other than just E/h does it represent anything?
 
Glenn G said:
What does it mean to define a frequency for a photon other than just E/h does it represent anything?

It does. We use the word radio for low frequencies, then microwave, infrared, visible light, and x-rays for photons of increasing frequency.

Edit: Also within the radio band, the frequency of the photons corresponds to the channel on the radio. For example, dial your radio to 90.7 Mhz or 107.9 Mhz.
 
Last edited:
Thanks anorlunda,
What is your understanding of the concept of frequency with photons, is it just an expression that equals E/h or do you think it actually represents the number of oscillations of an electric field within the photon per second?
 
Photons are eigenstates of a Fock space. As such they are not energy eigenstates. So a definite number of photons does not have a definite amount of energy nor a definite frequency. The states produced by a RF antenna are probably better approximated by a coherent state than either a Fock or an energy eigenstate.

It is all a useless exercise in unnecessarily complicating an already complicated phenomenon. Just stick with Maxwell's equations for radio waves.
 
Take @Dale 's advice. It is not helpful to think of photons with regard to radios.

Think of EM waves instead. The frequency of the wave determines the radio station. Modulation of the wave (AM or FM) determines the audio signals sent. The power of the radio station determines the strength of those waves. Trying to think of those things one photon at a time just leads you down a big hole of confusion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
23K