Classical Mechanics, clyinder inside a cylinder.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
Spoony
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
b]1. Homework Statement [/b]

A cylinder (solid) of radius a rolls inside a fixed hollow cylinder of radius 4a; inside a homogenous gravity field.

Find, langragian using the rolling angle of the little cylidner as a generalized co-ord.
angular frequency of small oscilalations about equilibrium. is the the oscillation more or less rapid than that of a point particle sliding without friction inside the hollow cylinder?

Homework Equations



L= T - V
[tex]T = 1/2 m \dot{r}^{2} + \frac{I}{2} \dot{\varphi}^{2}[/tex]
[tex]V = mgh[/tex]
[tex]chord length = 2Rsin(\frac{\theta}{2})[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



i have the lagrangian;

[tex]L = T-V = 1/2 M 12^{2} a^{2} \dot{\varphi}^{2} + 1/4 M a^{2} \dot{\varphi}^{2} - 3 \sqrt{2} a M g sin(2 \varphi)[/tex]

now i have trouble as when i got the small angle approximation [tex]sin(2 \varphi) [\tex] becomes [tex]2 \varphi[/tex] and when i put this int the euler lagrange equation i end up differentiating this with respect to [tex]\varphi[/tex] and so i get a constant, then I am left with the [tex]\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\varphi}}[/tex] bit being equal to a constant, [tex]3 \sqrt{2} a m g[/tex]<br /> which you can't solve with a function of cos and sine[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spoony said:
now i have trouble as when i got the small angle approximation [tex]sin(2 \varphi)[/tex] becomes [tex]2 \varphi[/tex] and when i put this int the euler lagrange equation i end up differentiating this with respect to [tex]\varphi[/tex] and so i get a constant, then I am left with the [tex]\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\varphi}}[/tex] bit being equal to a constant, [tex]3 \sqrt{2} a m g[/tex]
which you can't solve with a function of cos and sine

Isn't the point of making a small angle approximation to make the function linear, thus eliminating the need for cosine and sine terms?
 
you need the final awnser in terms of q(double dot) = a*q where a is a cosntant.
then you can get a trigonometric solution to the problem by making
q = sin(sqrt(a)*t)
its ok now I've done it :) the trick is to get the right hand side (the q bit) = cos(phi), then you can small angel approximate to (phi^2)/2 (constants are thrown away was lagrangian makes constants dissapear) then when you differentiate the equation to get the euler lagrangian the phi^2 becomes a phi, lovely :)
 
Spoony said:
you need the final awnser in terms of q(double dot) = a*q where a is a cosntant.
then you can get a trigonometric solution to the problem by making
q = sin(sqrt(a)*t)
its ok now I've done it :) the trick is to get the right hand side (the q bit) = cos(phi), then you can small angel approximate to (phi^2)/2 (constants are thrown away was lagrangian makes constants dissapear) then when you differentiate the equation to get the euler lagrangian the phi^2 becomes a phi, lovely :)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the small angle approximation of cosine [itex]\cos[x]=1-x^2/2[/itex]? And what constants were eliminated through the Lagrangian, because there shouldn't be any (maybe mass, but that depends on the system).