Classical Mechanics, clyinder inside a cylinder.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a solid cylinder rolling inside a fixed hollow cylinder under the influence of gravity. The original poster seeks to derive the Lagrangian using the rolling angle as a generalized coordinate and to analyze the angular frequency of small oscillations about equilibrium, comparing it to a point particle sliding without friction inside the hollow cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to formulate the Lagrangian and apply the Euler-Lagrange equation but encounters difficulties with the small angle approximation and the resulting equations. Some participants question the implications of the small angle approximation and its role in simplifying the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the formulation of the problem and the application of approximations. Some have suggested that the small angle approximation should lead to a linear function, while others are exploring the implications of constants in the Lagrangian. There is a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the mathematical steps involved.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific assumptions about small angle approximations and the treatment of constants within the Lagrangian framework. The discussion reflects a range of understandings regarding the mathematical formulation of the problem.

Spoony
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
b]1. Homework Statement [/b]

A cylinder (solid) of radius a rolls inside a fixed hollow cylinder of radius 4a; inside a homogenous gravity field.

Find, langragian using the rolling angle of the little cylidner as a generalized co-ord.
angular frequency of small oscilalations about equilibrium. is the the oscillation more or less rapid than that of a point particle sliding without friction inside the hollow cylinder?

Homework Equations



L= T - V
T = 1/2 m \dot{r}^{2} + \frac{I}{2} \dot{\varphi}^{2}
V = mgh
chord length = 2Rsin(\frac{\theta}{2})


The Attempt at a Solution



i have the lagrangian;

L = T-V = 1/2 M 12^{2} a^{2} \dot{\varphi}^{2} + 1/4 M a^{2} \dot{\varphi}^{2} - 3 \sqrt{2} a M g sin(2 \varphi)

now i have trouble as when i got the small angle approximation sin(2 \varphi) [\tex] becomes 2 \varphi and when i put this int the euler lagrange equation i end up differentiating this with respect to \varphi and so i get a constant, then I am left with the \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\varphi}} bit being equal to a constant, 3 \sqrt{2} a m g<br /> which you can&#039;t solve with a function of cos and sine
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spoony said:
now i have trouble as when i got the small angle approximation sin(2 \varphi) becomes 2 \varphi and when i put this int the euler lagrange equation i end up differentiating this with respect to \varphi and so i get a constant, then I am left with the \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\varphi}} bit being equal to a constant, 3 \sqrt{2} a m g
which you can't solve with a function of cos and sine

Isn't the point of making a small angle approximation to make the function linear, thus eliminating the need for cosine and sine terms?
 
you need the final awnser in terms of q(double dot) = a*q where a is a cosntant.
then you can get a trigonometric solution to the problem by making
q = sin(sqrt(a)*t)
its ok now I've done it :) the trick is to get the right hand side (the q bit) = cos(phi), then you can small angel approximate to (phi^2)/2 (constants are thrown away was lagrangian makes constants dissapear) then when you differentiate the equation to get the euler lagrangian the phi^2 becomes a phi, lovely :)
 
Spoony said:
you need the final awnser in terms of q(double dot) = a*q where a is a cosntant.
then you can get a trigonometric solution to the problem by making
q = sin(sqrt(a)*t)
its ok now I've done it :) the trick is to get the right hand side (the q bit) = cos(phi), then you can small angel approximate to (phi^2)/2 (constants are thrown away was lagrangian makes constants dissapear) then when you differentiate the equation to get the euler lagrangian the phi^2 becomes a phi, lovely :)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the small angle approximation of cosine \cos[x]=1-x^2/2? And what constants were eliminated through the Lagrangian, because there shouldn't be any (maybe mass, but that depends on the system).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K