Classical Mechanics - Pulleys System

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 6K views
TomAlso
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the pulleys system in the picture. Assume both pulleys are frictionless. Assume the rope is massless and inextensible. Find the acceleration of the mass [tex]m_2[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have solved the same problem with massless pulleys and I fail to see if their radii should be involved at all in the final result. So first notice that the acceleration of the mass [tex]m_2[/tex] is half of the acceleration of the mass [tex]m_1[/tex]. On [tex]m_1[/tex] we have:

[tex]m_1 g - T = m_1 a[/tex]

On [tex]m_2[/tex] we have:

[tex]2T - (m+m_2)g = (m+m_2) \cdot \frac{a}{2}[/tex]

which solves for

[tex]a = \frac{2*(m + m_2 - 2 m_1)}{4 m_1 + m + m_2}[/tex]

Anyone can offer any advice? In particular, how am I supposed to include the radius of the pulleys and the pulley that does not figure in the equation? Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • pulleys.jpg
    pulleys.jpg
    3.8 KB · Views: 613
Physics news on Phys.org
can you post the picture a different way? I can't see the attachment
 
The picture is just like http://img84.imageshack.us/i/carrucoleesameot5.jpg/" . Both pulleys have mass [tex]m[/tex] and radius [tex]r[/tex]. The mass labeled A is [tex]m_1[/tex] and B is [tex]m_2[/tex].

It says my attachment is pending approval, maybe that is the problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TomAlso said:
Anyone can offer any advice? In particular, how am I supposed to include the radius of the pulleys and the pulley that does not figure in the equation?
(1) Since the pulleys have mass, you cannot assume that the tension in the rope is the same throughout. Treat each rope segment as having a different tension; Label the tensions T1, T2, and T3.
(2) Don't ignore the rotational inertia of the pulleys. I presume that you can model the pulleys as uniform disks. (You'll need to analyze both pulleys.)