Classical Mechanics : Taylor or Morin?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the choice between "Classical Mechanics" by Morin and "Classical Mechanics" by Taylor for undergraduate physics students. Participants highlight that Morin offers a greater number of challenging problems, making it suitable for those seeking rigorous practice, while Taylor is noted for clearer explanations and a more approachable problem set. Users recommend using both texts in conjunction, with Morin for problem-solving and Taylor for conceptual understanding. Ultimately, the consensus is that both books are valuable, but Morin is preferred for its depth and problem quality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of undergraduate-level classical mechanics concepts
  • Familiarity with problem-solving techniques in physics
  • Basic knowledge of calculus and its applications in physics
  • Experience with physics textbooks and academic problem sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore "Classical Mechanics" by David Morin for advanced problem sets
  • Study "Classical Mechanics" by Taylor for clearer explanations and foundational concepts
  • Investigate the "Calculus of Variations" for advanced problem-solving techniques
  • Review "Goldstein's Classical Mechanics" for graduate-level insights and challenges
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, educators seeking textbook recommendations, and anyone interested in enhancing their problem-solving skills in classical mechanics.

  • #31
I would say that Taylor goes way more in depth on the topics but Morin does go into things like Lagrangian mechanics, vibrational modes, and even some introductory general relativity (which is my most favorite subject in all of physics xP).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
WannabeNewton said:
I would say that Taylor goes way more in depth on the topics but Morin does go into things like Lagrangian mechanics, vibrational modes, and even some introductory general relativity (which is my most favorite subject in all of physics xP).

At first I read that as "introductory general relativity" is your most favourite subject in all of physics, and I was about to say if what you are interested in is "introductory", then I really wonder what is "advanced general relativity"!
 
  • #33
atyy said:
At first I read that as "introductory general relativity" is your most favourite subject in all of physics, and I was about to say if what you are interested in is "introductory", then I really wonder what is "advanced general relativity"!
lmfao I lol'ed pretty hard at that one
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
20K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K