Classical theory of fields by landau and lifshitz

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the suitability of the book "Classical Theory of Fields" by Landau and Lifshitz for studying electromagnetism (E&M) and general relativity (GR). Participants explore its value as a resource in the context of graduate-level courses and research preparation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the book and the entire Landau and Lifshitz series are highly regarded and considered classics in the field.
  • One participant suggests that the E&M section serves as a good supplement to the latter part of a graduate course.
  • Another participant notes that while the GR section contains unique material, there are other texts that may serve as better introductions to the subject.
  • It is mentioned that the book could be beneficial as a continuation for those who have already had a basic introduction to GR.
  • Some participants recommend modern GR texts such as Carroll, Stephani, or Wald for those looking to prepare for GR research, suggesting that these may be more effective than Landau and Lifshitz for that purpose.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the effectiveness of Landau and Lifshitz for studying E&M and GR, with some viewing it as a classic resource while others advocate for alternative texts, indicating no consensus on its overall suitability.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the context of graduate-level study and research preparation, but there is no agreement on the completeness or adequacy of the book for these purposes.

captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
is this book good for studying e&m and general relativity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this book and the whole series ( L&L )are top of the line. These books are to be revered as classics.
 
The e&m part would be a good supplement to the second half of a graduate course. The gr part still has some unique material, but there are better introductions.
 
Daverz said:
The e&m part would be a good supplement to the second half of a graduate course. The gr part still has some unique material, but there are better introductions.

i mean as a continuation of studying GR if you have already had the basic introduction to it.
 
captain said:
i mean as a continuation of studying GR if you have already had the basic introduction to it.

As Helios says, CTF is a classic, but if your intent is to get up to speed for GR research, I'd recommend continuing on with modern GR books like Carrol, Stephani, or Wald. Then perhaps a book like A Relativist's Toolkit or Advanced General Relativity .
 

Similar threads

Better textbook for analytical mechanics
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Graduate Error in Landau-Lifshitz Vol 2, equation (2), page 277
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Graduate Reconciling units for the Einstein and Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensors
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Classical Looking for the absolute best fluid mechanics book available
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Landau-Lifshitz Navier-Stokes equation on which page of the textbook?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Classical Is Landau/Lifshitz series suitable for learning?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
Undergrad Help understanding proof of ds=ds' in Classical Theory of Fields
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Classical Seeking advice on Self Study Curriculum
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Classical Physics books written in Russian
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Classical Are There Scientific Errors in Goldstein's Classical Mechanics?
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K