Classifying singularities of a function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function $$ f(z)=\frac{\cos(z)}{(z-\pi/2)^7} $$ has a singularity at $$ \pi/2 $$, which initially appears to be a pole of order 7. However, upon evaluating the limit after multiplying by $$(z-\pi/2)^7$$, it is confirmed that it is not a pole of order 7. The singularity is not removable either, leading to the conclusion that it is not an essential singularity, as not all non-removable singularities are essential. The order of the pole must be investigated further, potentially being 6 or lower.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis concepts, specifically singularities.
  • Familiarity with Taylor series expansions, particularly for trigonometric functions like cos(z).
  • Knowledge of limits and their evaluation in the context of complex functions.
  • Ability to differentiate functions and analyze their behavior near singular points.
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the order of the pole for $$ f(z)=\frac{\cos(z)}{(z-\pi/2)^7} $$ by evaluating limits for orders 6 and 5.
  • Study the Taylor series expansion of $$ \cos(z) $$ around $$ z=\pi/2 $$ to identify coefficients that indicate the order of the pole.
  • Learn about the classification of singularities in complex analysis, focusing on poles and essential singularities.
  • Explore examples of functions with known singularities to solidify understanding of the concepts discussed.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as educators looking for examples of singularity classification in functions.

penroseandpaper
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Classify the singularity for the function

$$ f(z)=\frac{cos(z)} {(z-π/2)^7} $$
Relevant Equations
Theorems and lemmas related to essential singularities, poles and removable singularities.
I came across this question on chegg for practice as I'm self learning complex analysis, but became stumped on it and without access to the solution am unable to check.

Let $$ f(z)=\frac{cos(z)} {(z-π/2)^7} $$. Then the singularity is at π/2. And on first appearance, it looks like a pole of order 7. However, multiplying by $$(z-π/2)^7 $$ and taking the limit evaluates to zero - meaning it isn't a pole of order 7.

Similarly, the limit of f(z) doesn't exist either, so it can't be a removable singularity.

That must mean it is essential. But is that right and how can I go about proving that, other than showing the above are true leaving only the essential singularity as an option.

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
penroseandpaper said:
...it can't be a removable singularity.

That must mean it is essential. But is that right ...
No it's not right because not all non-removable singularities are essential. An essential singularity is a singularity that is not a pole of any order. Removable singularities are poles of order 0. So the point ##\pi/2## could be a pole of some finite order. That order cannot be greater than 7 since ##g(z):= f(z)(z-\pi/2)^7=\cos z## is holomorphic.
Since you have shown the pole doesn't have order 7, I suggest you investigate whether it has order 6. If that doesn't work try 5. I'd be surprised if the order were lower than 5.
 
penroseandpaper said:
Let $$ f(z)=\frac{cos(z)} {(z-π/2)^7} $$. Then the singularity is at π/2. And on first appearance, it looks like a pole of order 7. However, multiplying by $$(z-π/2)^7 $$ and taking the limit evaluates to zero - meaning it isn't a pole of order 7.
Consider the Taylor series expansion of cos(z) at z=##\pi/2##. You know what the derivative of cos(z) is so you should know something about a coefficient in the Taylor series. Use that to determine the order of the pole of f(z).
penroseandpaper said:
Similarly, the limit of f(z) doesn't exist either, so it can't be a removable singularity.
There are other possible orders of the pole. A zero of cos(z) of order n will make the pole of f(z) be a pole of order 7-n.
penroseandpaper said:
That must mean it is essential. But is that right and how can I go about proving that, other than showing the above are true leaving only the essential singularity as an option.
It is not an essential singularity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K