Quantum Clifford Algebra for Quantum Field Theory, Supersymmetry, Supergravity

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of learning Clifford algebra and spinors in higher dimensions, particularly for studying AdS/CFT and supersymmetry (SUSY). The participant has reviewed several resources, including "Introduction to the AdS/CFT Correspondence" by Horaƫiu Năstase and "Supergravity" by Freedman and Van Proeyen, but finds them lacking in motivation and detailed explanations. They seek more comprehensive books or lectures that specifically address Clifford algebra and spinors with a focus on applications in quantum field theory. Recommendations include David Hestenes' work on spacetime algebra and Zee's book on group theory, as well as Jim Gates' writings on superspace. The need for resources that provide both clarity and motivation in this complex subject area is emphasized.
shinobi20
Messages
277
Reaction score
20
I'm currently trying to learn Clifford algebra or more specifically spinors, in higher dimensions. My goal is to study AdS/CFT, but an essential part of learning it is to understand SUSY which then needs some element of Clifford algebra in higher dimensions.

I have consulted,
Introduction to the AdS/CFT Correspondence by Horaƫiu Năstase
Supergravity by Daniel Z. Freedman and Antoine Van Proeyen

The book by Năstase only discussed it in a section and is extremely compact, no motivation and discussion of the steps. The book by Freedman devoted two sections and is more comprehensive than Năstase, but it is still lacking in motivation with the steps and some equations.

So, I'm looking for books or lectures more devoted to Clifford algebra/spinors in higher dimensions that is tailored specifically for people pursuing AdS/CFT or quantum field theory. I believe Clifford algebra/spinors in higher dimensions resources can be extremely varied in its presentation depending on the target audience. I've searched the web for some lectures but either it is also too brief and just a list of equations or it is geared towards mathematicians with theorem-proof format.

An example of the briefness and no motivation style is to just present the higher dimensional ##\gamma##-matrices as a bunch of tensor products of ##\sigma##-matrices. My question is, why? No explanation or motivation at all, this goes on throughout the books I listed above, just listing down and checking that every equation is consistent with the previous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with David Hestenes spacetime algebra. Very good intro with intuition for physics.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Zee's book on Group Theory has a nice overview on Clifford algebras.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
For susy there's no better than sueperspace and 1000 and 1 lessons by jim gates et al.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Hello Intellectuals! So far it seems to be reasonable to learn mathematics in a rigorous way by not solely considering the techniques of problem solving or the applications of a particular subject or concept. Also to truly appreciate the beauty of mathematical endeavor one need to learn the reasoning behind the origination of concepts in mathematics, so as a beginner it appears to be worthwhile to learn the highly abstract aspects of mathematics like proofs, logic, and topics in pure...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K