CMB: L to Angle Conversion Simplified

  • Thread starter Thread starter nicksauce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle
nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
7
In discussion of the CMB it is often claimed that a spherical harmonic l roughly corresponds to l = \frac{\pi}{\theta}. Does anyone know a simple way to show this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
nicksauce said:
In discussion of the CMB it is often claimed that a spherical harmonic l roughly corresponds to l = \frac{\pi}{\theta}. Does anyone know a simple way to show this?
First of all, if we pick any of the various Y^l_m's, we know that the size of the variations for any m for a given l is the same. So we can pick one particular Y^l_m that has a particularly simple functional form, m = \pm l:

Y^l_{\pm l} \left(\theta, \phi\right) \propto e^{\pm il\phi}

So here we have a situation where all of the variation is in the \phi direction, with the typical with of a peak being \theta = \frac{\pi}{\l}.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top