CMB Redshift Question (Visible Wavelengths)

AI Thread Summary
The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation, initially at a temperature of about 3000 K, would have passed through the visible spectrum during its redshift journey. If humans had existed at that time, the night sky would indeed have been bright due to the uniform temperature of the CMB. Before the CMB became transparent, the surrounding hydrogen gas was ionized and opaque, limiting photon travel. The CMB did not start as gamma rays, but rather as mostly infrared radiation with some visible light. Overall, the early universe's light would have been intense enough to cause significant exposure if one were present.
Capler
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've looked quite a bit on this forum and also elsewhere online and I cannot really find any information on my inquiry. If this is a double post please delete and send me in the right direction.

Now I may be totally off on my thought process, but as I understand it the CMB first started off as gamma ray radiation and has since redshifted to the radio.

At some point in this redshift journey it must have passed through the visible spectrum.

Which leads me to my question: If we were alive during that time when it was shifting through the visible (assuming there was a time), would the "night's" sky have been bright? Since the CMB is literally everywhere, would we not even be able to see due to overexposure?

Or would the CMB have not been intense enough to even visibly see during this time?

Once again thanks for any insight!
 
Space news on Phys.org
Capler said:
I've looked quite a bit on this forum and also elsewhere online and I cannot really find any information on my inquiry. If this is a double post please delete and send me in the right direction.

Now I may be totally off on my thought process, but as I understand it the CMB first started off as gamma ray radiation and has since redshifted to the radio.

At some point in this redshift journey it must have passed through the visible spectrum.

Which leads me to my question: If we were alive during that time when it was shifting through the visible (assuming there was a time), would the "night's" sky have been bright? Since the CMB is literally everywhere, would we not even be able to see due to overexposure?

Or would the CMB have not been intense enough to even visibly see during this time?

Once again thanks for any insight!

Yes the night sky would have been bright. Uniform temperature of about 3000 kelvin.

According to the standard cosmo model the CMB photons date from a time about 380,000 years from start of expansion and the CMB redshift is about 1100.

Before that the hydrogen gas filling space was sufficiently ionized so as to be effectively opaque---photons had a limited mean free path and were always being scattered. The temperature was above 3000 K. The CMB photons date from the moment that the medium cooled enough to become effectively transparent.

You are mistaken about the CMB starting as gammaray. It would have started as mostly infrared with a small percentage of visible, like the glow off a star that is 3000 K, more orange than the sun, not so hot has the sun.

If you remember the CMB redshift z = 1100, and the presentday CMB temperature T = 2.728 K, then you can multiply to get the temperature back then when the photons began their journey.

2.7 x 1100 = about 3000

The same factor works for the ratio of wavelengths.

As you can imagine, anyone back then bathed in that early light would be rapidly cooked.
 
Last edited:
Hmm.. awesome. Thanks for the reply and correction about my gamma ray misconception.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top