CO2 laser and sigarette smoke question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Minich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Co2 Laser Smoke
AI Thread Summary
In a lab focused on constructing CO2 lasers for space applications, a humorous experiment involved blowing cigarette smoke into the laser's focal area. The smoke was observed to be expelled in the opposite direction of the laser, prompting questions about the underlying physics. The discussion suggests that the phenomenon may be due to the heating and ionization of smoke particles, creating a plasma that absorbs laser energy and generates pressure directed toward the laser. This pressure causes the smoke to move away from the focal point rather than dispersing in all directions. The conversation reflects a blend of nostalgia for the innovative atmosphere of the lab and curiosity about the scientific principles at play.
Minich
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
In 1975 I've got the job in lab constructing middle power one mode CO2 lasers for outer space object location (they used C and O isotopes for reducing losses in atmosfere).

The main joke for newbies of our lab's boss (Yuri Vasilievich Pechenin) was to breathe sigarette smoke from mouth into focus area of operating laser (1 to 3 kilowatt output radiation ordinary).

And there was a question:

Why was the smoke rocketed from focus area in opposite direction (from focus to laser)?

I don't remember the reason. Who can help?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Sure would like to see a video of this.

Unfortunatly in this day and age they will not let us any where near our lasers with a cigerett in hand (or mouth for that matter!)
 
Our boss wanted to show us that we work in proper place. And we worked with greate emotion and proud that we make best in the world lasers those days :)))

And lasers were not scientific installations only, they were produced in series at the plant. They were industrial lasers.

We were fascinated by creative atmosfere.We were aheard of laser groups in USSR, headed by Nobel Prize wiiners Basov and Prochorov (in CO2 line)..

I think video of those days are for restricted access only.
 
Perhaps a hefty transfer of momentum from the photons? According to widely cited academic sources (XKCD) it takes 1.21GW/m^2 to levitate a squirrel of mass 0.7kg. Consider that gas particles have masses lower by several orders of magnitude ;)

Also, it might be a heat/pressure wave. When I place something into the focal point of a reasonably high powered laser it begins to emit white light.
 
Last edited:
To dst.

I remember it is connected with the temperature of spots on sigarett smoke bit and reactive force due to sigarette bit burning. But why is temperature on focus side higher?

Sigarette bit in laser beam is burning inhomogeneosly and behaves like rocket.

Excuse my poor english. I had never been outside former USSR and had never practice in written english.
 
I'll have a go at this;

If the laser spot hits the smoke particles they will heat up, if sufficient heat is imparted on the particles they will ionize forming a plasma.

This heated vapor at first directs pressure in all directions, however, the plasma absorbs most of the incident light, so the front of heated dusted partciles traveling towards the laser acts as an absorption front fot the laser energy, which in turn exerts pressure towards the laser.

In simple terms, there is an absorbing front created by the smoke plasma which travels towards the laser by the expansion of the heated gas.

Why doesn't it go in all directions? Simply because the point of absorption is getting closer and closer to the laser.

Does this help?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top