Code Requirements for finger-safe Conductor Rail

  • Thread starter Thread starter jhaislip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Code Conductor
AI Thread Summary
For installing "finger-safe" conductor rails in an observatory, it's essential to verify compliance with local electrical codes. The IP2 rating indicates the rails are finger-safe, but confirmation from local building inspectors is necessary to ensure they meet safety standards. Contacting the municipal Building Inspector department is crucial, as they will review and approve construction plans. Additionally, consulting with an insurance agent can provide insights on relevant building codes to maintain coverage. Ensuring adherence to these guidelines will help mitigate safety risks for visitors.
jhaislip
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Code Requirements for "finger-safe" Conductor Rail

I'm planning to install conductor rails about 7ft above the floor in an astronomical observatory. The rails are IP2 "finger safe" rated. Where should I look to determine if this is sufficient enough for conductor rails which will be within reach to some of those visiting the observatory? There has to be a document somewhere stating the electrical code and showing me if IP2 is acceptable right?

Here is info on the rails:
Conductix-Wampfler Conductor Bar - Cluster Bar
http://www.conductix.us/catalogs_download.cfm?CatalogID=356"
Installed in North Carolina

Thanks everyone,

Josh
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Josh,

You can start with your local municipal Building Inspector department at City Hall. They are the ones you will need to file your construction plan with (since it is an electrical addition to the building), and they will be the ones to sign off on the final construction.

Also be sure to contact your business' insurance agent -- they may have some recommendations on building codes to follow to be sure to not impact your insurance coverage.

:smile:
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'

Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'

I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
View full post »

Thread 'EMF (Electromagnetic Field) & EHS (Electromagnetic Hyper Sensitivity)'

Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top