Coefficient of Kinetic Friction for incline

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the coefficient of kinetic friction for a box sliding down an incline at a constant speed. The original poster explores whether the relationship between the coefficient of kinetic friction and the angle of the incline, expressed as tan(x), is universally applicable in two-dimensional scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the coefficient of kinetic friction using the normal force and gravitational components, questioning the validity of the tan(x) relationship under constant speed conditions.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's equation for the specific scenario described, noting that it may not apply in more complex situations involving acceleration. The dialogue indicates a shared understanding of the basic principles involved, though no consensus on broader applications is reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the relationship may not hold in scenarios with additional complexities, such as acceleration, suggesting a need for caution in applying the derived equation universally.

Feldoh
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
3
This really isn't a homework question -- but it does involve my homework. Say you've got a box sliding down an incline of x degrees at a constant speed, I somehow got that that coefficient of kinetic friction is equal to tan(x). Will this always hold true for objects moving at a constant speed on an incline in two dimensions?

Basically I solved for the normal force:
[tex]F_{Net}=0[/tex]
[tex]F_N-F_g_y=0[/tex]
[tex]F_N=mgcos(x)[/tex]

Then for the coefficient of friction:
[tex]F_{Net} = 0[/tex]
[tex]F_f-F_g_x = 0[/tex]
[tex]F_f = F_g_x[/tex]
[tex]\mu_kF_n = F_g_x[/tex]
[tex]\mu_k = (F_g_x)/(F_N)[/tex]
[tex]\mu_k = mgsin(x)/mgcos(x)[/tex]
[tex]\mu_k = tan(x)[/tex]

Where [tex]F_{g_x}[/tex] is the horizontal component of the force of the gravitational field, and [tex]F_{g_y}[/tex] is the vertical component.

I was just wondering, it's sort of situational but it is a shortcut none-the-less if it does actually work.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this equation should hold true for situations like you have described above. Of course if you have more complicated scenarios, such as one with acceleration, this won't hold.
 
G01 said:
Yes, this equation should hold true for situations like you have described above. Of course if you have more complicated scenarios, such as one with acceleration, this won't hold.

Awesome, thanks for the fast reply. :smile:
 
No problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K