Coherent States of the Harmonic Oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Coherent states of the harmonic oscillator are defined as eigenfunctions of the annihilation operator, specifically represented as |\alpha\rangle = ∑(α^n/√(n!))|n⟩. When the annihilation operator acts on this state, it yields a result proportional to the original state, confirming its eigenfunction status. In contrast, the creation operator does not possess normalizable eigenfunctions, as demonstrated in the position basis where its eigenfunction is non-normalizable, thus disallowing it as an eigenstate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly harmonic oscillators.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of annihilation and creation operators.
  • Knowledge of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of position basis representation in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of coherent states in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of non-normalizable eigenfunctions in quantum systems.
  • Learn about the position representation of quantum operators, particularly the annihilation and creation operators.
  • Investigate the role of coherent states in quantum optics and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on harmonic oscillators, coherent states, and operator theory. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of quantum state representations.

tshafer
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Alright, I'm sure I'm missing something extremely simple, but in Griffiths (and another text I'm reading) coherent states are mentioned as eigenfunctions of the annihilation operator.

I just don't understand:
a) how you can have an eigenfunction of the annihilation operator (other than |0>) if the whole point is it knocks you down a level from |n> to |n-1>

b) why the creation operator is described as not having ay eigenfunctions if you can have eigenfunctions of the annihilation operator

any help would be great, thanks!
tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tshafer said:
a) how you can have an eigenfunction of the annihilation operator (other than |0>) if the whole point is it knocks you down a level from |n> to |n-1>

An individual [itex]|n\rangle[/itex] state is obviously not an eigenstate (if [itex]n[/itex] is not zero), but a linear combination of them can be. Define a state [itex]|\alpha\rangle[/itex] as
[tex]|\alpha\rangle \equiv \sum_{n=0}^\infty{ \alpha^n\over\sqrt{n!}}|n\rangle[/tex]
and act on it with the annihilation operator [itex]a[/itex]; using [itex]a|n\rangle=\sqrt{n}|n{-}1\rangle[/itex], we get
[tex]a|\alpha\rangle <br /> = \sum_{n=0}^\infty{ \alpha^n\over\sqrt{n!}}\sqrt{n}|n{-}1\rangle<br /> = \sum_{n=1}^\infty{ \alpha^n\over\sqrt{(n{-}1)!}}|n{-}1\rangle.[/tex]
Now replace [itex]n[/itex] with [itex]n{+}1[/itex], and we have
[tex]a|\alpha\rangle<br /> = \sum_{n=0}^\infty{ \alpha^{n+1}\over\sqrt{n!}}|n\rangle<br /> = \alpha\sum_{n=0}^\infty{ \alpha^{n}\over\sqrt{n!}}|n\rangle<br /> = \alpha|\alpha\rangle.[/tex]
tshafer said:
b) why the creation operator is described as not having any eigenfunctions if you can have eigenfunctions of the annihilation operator.

Well, the same trick doesn't work for the creation operator. Another way to do it is to work in the position basis, where [itex]a[/itex] becomes something like [itex]x+d/dx[/itex] (with various constants left out), and [itex]a^\dagger[/itex] becomes something like [itex]x-d/dx[/itex]. The first has an eigenfunction [itex]\exp[-(x-\alpha)^2/2][/itex] with eigenvalue [itex]\alpha[/itex], and the second has an eigenfunction [itex]\exp[+(x-\alpha)^2/2][/itex]. But this eigenfunction is not normalizable, so is not allowed.
 
Nice, that's a cute trick. I'll work through what you just said so I can get it for myself. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K