Qualitative plots of harmonic oscillator wave function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2
For the harmonic oscillator, I'm trying to study qualitative plots of the wave function from the one-dimensional time independent Schrödinger equation:

[tex]\frac{d^2 \psi(x)}{dx^2} = [V(x) - E] \psi(x)[/tex]

If you look at the attached image, you'll find a plot of the first energy eigenfunction for the HO. In the image, for x > 0, the the wave function is greater than 0 and the graph is concave down.

My question is: why can't the wave function be less than 0 and have the graph be concave up for this first eigenfunction? Put another way, why can't we simply mirror the attached image wave function over the x-axis and have that be a valid first energy eigenfunction of the HO?

Is it just a choice of initial conditions of psi and the derivative of psi and that we chose them to be positive?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-04-26 at 1.53.22 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-04-26 at 1.53.22 PM.png
    1.6 KB · Views: 619
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that the wave function is complex and a function of time. You have only plotted one part of it (the real part perhaps) at one time. If you wait half a cycle, or if you multiply it by an arbitrary phase [itex]e^{i \pi}[/itex] then it will look like what you suggested.
 
Hey great points, thanks so much.

Just to confirm:

If I were presented with the wavefunction in the attached image above as well as the one I described and was asked to pick which of the two was a possible wave function for the first energy eigenfunction of the harmonic oscillator, then both are reasonable, correct?
 
eprparadox said:
Hey great points, thanks so much.

Just to confirm:

If I were presented with the wavefunction in the attached image above as well as the one I described and was asked to pick which of the two was a possible wave function for the first energy eigenfunction of the harmonic oscillator, then both are reasonable, correct?

I think so, yes.