Coil Winding Orientation and Pattern....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of different coil winding configurations on the magnetic field properties of electromagnets. Participants explore two distinct methods of winding: a concentric spiral approach versus a standard spool method. The conversation touches on theoretical implications, practical applications, and the behavior of magnetic fields in relation to these configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the magnetic field properties may differ between the two winding methods, questioning whether one method results in a "bulging" magnetic field compared to the other.
  • One participant suggests that while the number of Amp-Turns is the same, the parasitic effects such as leakage inductance (Lk) and parasitic capacitance (Cww) will be different, potentially increasing with the first winding method.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the terms Lk and Cww, seeking clarification on their implications and whether there are advantages to the alternative winding method.
  • A later reply explains that the increase in Lk and Cww is due to the spatial arrangement of the windings, which affects voltage differences and flux linkage.
  • One participant argues that for DC operation, the winding configuration does not affect the magnetic field, emphasizing that the distribution of turns around the core is what matters.
  • Concerns are raised about insulation requirements based on winding configuration, noting that minimizing voltage differences between adjacent windings can reduce insulation volume and resistive losses.
  • Another participant highlights that for AC excitation, the winding configuration becomes more significant, particularly at higher frequencies where the coil may behave more like a transmission line.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the impact of coil configuration on magnetic field properties, particularly in DC versus AC applications. There is no consensus on whether one winding method is superior to the other, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall implications of these configurations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on specific definitions of Lk and Cww for some participants, as well as the dependence on the operational context (DC vs AC) for determining the significance of winding configurations.

shintashi
Messages
117
Reaction score
1
OK, so imagine you have a wire coiling over itself, in a near concentric spiral. When you get to the outer most edge, such as 10 or 100 wrappings depending on thickness, you then bend the wire so it's one diameter of the wire over and then start spiraling inward, till you get to the smallest diameter, then bend again, spiral the coil back to the largest diameter, and repeat this sequence.

While the wrapping style of this coil configuration is very different from the standard spool, of slinky one wrap along a parallel line slowly working left, then stopping, followed by wrapping it slowly right, then reversing, until the total wrappings are complete,

I really want to know if the magnetic field properties are different between these two? Do the magnetic fields bulge out more in method one, or do they have different properties than method 2? Method 2 is the standard method.

Essentially, while the amount of magnetic wire is the same, the electricity is pulsing in and out, and gradually working left to right,

while in method 2, the electricity appears to pulse left to right, while gradually working from into out.

So does coil configuration really matter? After all, the left hand rule says the direction of the magnetic effect, such as for a solenoid, is going to stay the same if both are wrapped in the same direction.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
shintashi said:
OK, so imagine you have a wire coiling over itself, in a near concentric spiral. When you get to the outer most edge, such as 10 or 100 wrappings depending on thickness, you then bend the wire so it's one diameter of the wire over and then start spiraling inward, till you get to the smallest diameter, then bend again, spiral the coil back to the largest diameter, and repeat this sequence.

While the wrapping style of this coil configuration is very different from the standard spool, of slinky one wrap along a parallel line slowly working left, then stopping, followed by wrapping it slowly right, then reversing, until the total wrappings are complete,

I really want to know if the magnetic field properties are different between these two? Do the magnetic fields bulge out more in method one, or do they have different properties than method 2? Method 2 is the standard method.

Essentially, while the amount of magnetic wire is the same, the electricity is pulsing in and out, and gradually working left to right,

while in method 2, the electricity appears to pulse left to right, while gradually working from into out.

So does coil configuration really matter? After all, the left hand rule says the direction of the magnetic effect, such as for a solenoid, is going to stay the same if both are wrapped in the same direction.
You have the same number of Amp-Turns, so you should get the same magenetizing inductance Lm, IMO. But your parasitics will be quite different, with a higher leakage inductance Lk and parasitic capacitance Cww. Can you say why Lk and Cww will go up with this winding technique? :smile:
 
0028.png


0086.png


0114.png


here's 3 crude Images to explain what I mean by method 1. Each coil connects to the second coil, but they swap connecting points from inside to outside to inside repeatedly from one disk to the next.
 
I do not understand what Lk and Cww means so i have no idea if they will go up. I was wondering though if there were any pros to match whatever cons the alternative coiling method might have, and how the magnetic field lines would look different. :)
 
shintashi said:
I do not understand what Lk and Cww means so i have no idea if they will go up. I was wondering though if there were any pros to match whatever cons the alternative coiling method might have, and how the magnetic field lines would look different. :)
I don't see any pros offhand, and the higher Lk and Cww are definitely bad things.

The reason they go up is that each winding is adjacent to a winding that is "far away" from its neighbors, so the voltage difference seen between side-to-side windings is larger, which increases the effective winding-to-winding capacitance, Cww. And the flux linkage is worse because of the same reason, so Lk goes up.
 
shintashi said:
So does coil configuration really matter?
If you are winding an electromagnet that will be operated on DC, then each turn of the winding will carry the same current. It is the distribution of all those single turns in space and about the core that determines the magnetic field. For DC, winding configuration does not change the magnetic field.

There is a voltage drop across each turn and each layer due to the resistance of the wire. The wire is insulated. Voltage has no effect on the magnetic field. But the order of winding the coil determines which turns are adjacent to which other turns. That has insulation implications. It is normal to wind a coil so as to keep difference voltages between near windings to a minimum as that will reduce the volume of insulation required. More insulation would reduce the space for copper so the resistive losses would increase, or the outer size of the winding might increase, resulting in changes to the magnetic field.

The implications of coil winding configuration become more important for AC excitation. As the frequency rises there are many effects that start to come into play. When the total length of wire in the winding approaches one tenth of a wavelength the coil may need to be treated more like a transmission line than an inductor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K