Cold Dark Matter: Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down Structure Formation

AI Thread Summary
Cold dark matter (CDM) leads to a bottom-up structure formation scenario because its slow-moving, non-relativistic particles can clump together more easily due to lower energy and momentum. This clumping is influenced by free streaming damping, which prevents density perturbations smaller than a certain length from forming. In contrast, hot dark matter (HDM) particles, which remain relativistic longer, result in a top-down scenario as they cannot bind into smaller structures effectively. Simulations comparing the evolution of the universe post-Big Bang support these theories by illustrating how different dark matter types affect structure formation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the large-scale structure of the universe.
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Why does cold dark matter imply a bottom-up scenario of structure formation? and why does hot dark matter imply a top-down scenario of structure formation?

is it simply because cold dark matter is slow moving (non-relativistic) and slow moving things are more likely to clump together to form larger things because they possesses less energy and momentum? or is there more to it?

thank you in advance!
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
I can't answer your question specifically. However, the various studies of cold vs. warm are made using computer simulations of how the universe would evolve after the big bang and comparing to what is observed.
 
This is due to damping of density perturbations. For collisionless particles the most important damping effect is the free streaming damping. Free streaming damping means that the gravitation of the density perturbations of those particles cannot bind them below their free streaming length, and therefore density perturbations smaller than this length cannot form. The free streaming length is the length that those particles can travel until they become non-relativistic. Heavy dark matter particles like CDM particles are assumed to become non-relativistic very early, having thus a small free streaming length. This, in turn, means that density perturbations on small scales can be formed leading to a bottom-up scenario of structure formation.
 
Last edited:
if anyone knows of any papers at any level that i can read to understand free stream damping and its relationship to cold/hot dark matter better, please post them here.

thank you!
 
You can find a small introduction in section 7 of the reference 21 (Neutrinos and structure formation in the universe) here:
http://www.ita.uni-heidelberg.de/~msb/Publications/pubConferences.html

Here you can find some general notions about the formation of large scale structures:
http://fisica.usac.edu.gt/public/curccaf_proc/borganihtml/borgani.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i will read those. thanks much!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top