Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a collection of science-related jokes and humorous anecdotes shared among forum members. A notable joke features a mathematician with a dog and a cow who are claimed to be knot theorists, leading to a playful exchange with a bartender. Other jokes include puns related to physics, such as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and light-hearted takes on mathematical concepts. The conversation also touches on the nature of humor in science, with members explaining the nuances of certain jokes, particularly those involving mathematical notation. Additionally, there are references to classic jokes that have circulated over the years, illustrating how humor can bridge complex scientific ideas with everyday life. Overall, the thread highlights the community's appreciation for clever wordplay and the joy of sharing science humor.
  • #1,831
nc_ohc=L-tdBbx37fkAX8V6IL8&_nc_ht=scontent.fymq2-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, nuuskur, Wrichik Basu and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,833
Screen Shot 2020-08-14 at 9.48.48 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes phinds, nuuskur, Wrichik Basu and 4 others
  • #1,834
Screen Shot 2020-08-13 at 4.06.50 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes nuuskur, Wrichik Basu and jack action
  • #1,835
BillTre said:
Seems to be Schrödinger's window, too. Maybe it is Schrödinger's bathroom after all.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu and BillTre
  • #1,836
1598193358939.png
 
  • #1,837
  • #1,838
Connect it to a power strip. Powering half of its outlets should be sufficient!
 
  • #1,839
If it takes 3 pins to run a 3 kW device, then it clearly only requires 2 pins to run a 2 kW device, and 1 pin to run a 1 kW device. I don't see the problem.

Fundamentally, it is conservation of energy that precludes plugging a three terminal device into a two terminal outlet.
 
  • #1,840
Baluncore said:
Fundamentally, it is conservation of energy that precludes plugging a three terminal device into a two terminal outlet.
Think outside the box!
 
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi and Keith_McClary
  • #1,841
Screen Shot 2020-08-25 at 9.34.08 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes dextercioby, collinsmark, Ibix and 3 others
  • #1,842
Screen Shot 2020-08-25 at 9.33.10 AM.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes EHope, Demystifier, hmmm27 and 9 others
  • #1,844
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes EHope, Demystifier, davenn and 6 others
  • #1,846
Randall Munroe is delighting physicists again:
https://xkcd.com/2351/
standard_model_changes.png

Title text: Bugs are spin 1/2 particles, unless it's particularly windy.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, collinsmark, Keith_McClary and 1 other person
  • #1,847
Screen Shot 2020-08-30 at 1.43.45 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DrClaude, collinsmark and Keith_McClary
  • #1,848
Ending stupidity would help with the COVID-19 pandemic, too.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
  • Informative
Likes Wrichik Basu, Keith_McClary, collinsmark and 3 others
  • #1,849
mfb said:
Ending stupidity would help with the COVID-19 pandemic, too.
That someone will prove ERH, NP≠P, and Collatz all in one year is more likely.
 
  • #1,850
US Naval Observatory.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, DrClaude, Keith_McClary and 4 others
  • #1,851
1598842554461.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes Demystifier, DennisN, diogenesNY and 9 others
  • #1,852
diatomic-elements.jpg
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes EHope, diogenesNY, Borg and 1 other person
  • #1,853
Screen Shot 2020-08-31 at 9.25.14 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes DanielMB, DennisN, davenn and 3 others
  • #1,854
Ye olde periodic table.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes DanielMB, DennisN, ChemAir and 7 others
  • #1,855
IMG_20200902_234824.jpg

Answer of this question is (b) and this question was from India's most standard exam.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes mfb and Keith_McClary
  • #1,856
Was that test in 1997?

Not even the question makes sense. Cancer is not a single disease, it's a large range of diseases. Some are well curable, some are not.

This question can be found in various solution databases, and none of them seem to care that the question and the supposed answer make no sense.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, Frigus and atyy
  • #1,857
mfb said:
Was that test in 1997?
Yes,this question was from 1997.
mfb said:
This question can be found in various solution databases, and none of them seem to care that the question and the supposed answer make no sense.
That was the first reason for which i
posted the question here.
There are always some questions in this exam which technically don't makes sense but are Just taken from book lines.
 
  • #1,858
Hemant said:
Yes,this question was from 1997.
That means the two decades are fully in the past now. But cancer is still around.
 
  • #1,859
1599308761728.png
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, DanielMB, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #1,860
Let's hope they never meet.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi, Wrichik Basu and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 465 ·
16
Replies
465
Views
34K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K