Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
  • #1,831
nc_ohc=L-tdBbx37fkAX8V6IL8&_nc_ht=scontent.fymq2-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: davenn, nuuskur, Wrichik Basu and 2 others
  • #1,832
c82027b0bd620138197f005056a9545d.gif
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: EHope, collinsmark, nuuskur and 4 others
  • #1,833
Screen Shot 2020-08-14 at 9.48.48 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: phinds, nuuskur, Wrichik Basu and 4 others
  • #1,834
Screen Shot 2020-08-13 at 4.06.50 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, Wrichik Basu and jack action
  • #1,835
BillTre said:
Seems to be Schrödinger's window, too. Maybe it is Schrödinger's bathroom after all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu and BillTre
  • #1,836
1598193358939.png
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
  • #1,837
  • #1,838
Connect it to a power strip. Powering half of its outlets should be sufficient!
 
  • #1,839
If it takes 3 pins to run a 3 kW device, then it clearly only requires 2 pins to run a 2 kW device, and 1 pin to run a 1 kW device. I don't see the problem.

Fundamentally, it is conservation of energy that precludes plugging a three terminal device into a two terminal outlet.
 
  • #1,840
Baluncore said:
Fundamentally, it is conservation of energy that precludes plugging a three terminal device into a two terminal outlet.
Think outside the box!
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and Keith_McClary
  • #1,841
Screen Shot 2020-08-25 at 9.34.08 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby, collinsmark, Ibix and 3 others
  • #1,842
Screen Shot 2020-08-25 at 9.33.10 AM.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: EHope, Demystifier, hmmm27 and 9 others
  • #1,844
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: EHope, Demystifier, davenn and 6 others
  • #1,845
fourier-analysis.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, etotheipi, Ibix and 1 other person
  • #1,846
Randall Munroe is delighting physicists again:
https://xkcd.com/2351/
standard_model_changes.png

Title text: Bugs are spin 1/2 particles, unless it's particularly windy.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: davenn, collinsmark, Keith_McClary and 1 other person
  • #1,847
Screen Shot 2020-08-30 at 1.43.45 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude, collinsmark and Keith_McClary
  • #1,848
Ending stupidity would help with the COVID-19 pandemic, too.
 
  • Like
  • Skeptical
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, Keith_McClary, collinsmark and 3 others
  • #1,849
mfb said:
Ending stupidity would help with the COVID-19 pandemic, too.
That someone will prove ERH, NP≠P, and Collatz all in one year is more likely.
 
  • #1,850
US Naval Observatory.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu, DrClaude, Keith_McClary and 4 others
  • #1,851
1598842554461.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, DennisN, diogenesNY and 9 others
  • #1,852
diatomic-elements.jpg
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EHope, diogenesNY, Borg and 1 other person
  • #1,853
Screen Shot 2020-08-31 at 9.25.14 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DanielMB, DennisN, davenn and 3 others
  • #1,854
Ye olde periodic table.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DanielMB, DennisN, ChemAir and 7 others
  • #1,855
IMG_20200902_234824.jpg

Answer of this question is (b) and this question was from India's most standard exam.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: mfb and Keith_McClary
  • #1,856
Was that test in 1997?

Not even the question makes sense. Cancer is not a single disease, it's a large range of diseases. Some are well curable, some are not.

This question can be found in various solution databases, and none of them seem to care that the question and the supposed answer make no sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn, Frigus and atyy
  • #1,857
mfb said:
Was that test in 1997?
Yes,this question was from 1997.
mfb said:
This question can be found in various solution databases, and none of them seem to care that the question and the supposed answer make no sense.
That was the first reason for which i
posted the question here.
There are always some questions in this exam which technically don't makes sense but are Just taken from book lines.
 
  • #1,858
Hemant said:
Yes,this question was from 1997.
That means the two decades are fully in the past now. But cancer is still around.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
  • #1,859
1599308761728.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn, DanielMB, DennisN and 1 other person
  • #1,860
Let's hope they never meet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi, Wrichik Basu and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
17K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
10K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
8K