Collision between two identical objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter staralfur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Momentum
AI Thread Summary
In a collision scenario involving two identical cars traveling at 60 mph toward each other, the discussion centers on whether it's better for drivers to collide head-on or swerve into a concrete wall. The key consideration is that both collisions result in the same amount of kinetic energy loss. The conversation raises questions about the mathematical proof of outcomes using conservation of energy and momentum principles. Additionally, variations in mass or speed could alter the dynamics of the collisions, but the initial conditions suggest a straightforward conclusion. The overall consensus leans toward analyzing the physics to determine the safest option in such scenarios.
staralfur
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Cars A and B have the sama mass.
A and B are traveling at 60 mph toward each other. They have two options: hitting the other car head on, or swerving into a massive concrete wall, also head on. (assume the same amount of KE is lost by your car in both collisions.) Should the drivers hit the other car or the wall?
What if the masses or speeds would not be the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
staralfur said:
assume the same amount of KE is lost by your car in both collisions
Doesn't the above already answer the question?

 
staralfur said:
Cars A and B have the sama mass.
A and B are traveling at 60 mph toward each other. They have two options: hitting the other car head on, or swerving into a massive concrete wall, also head on. (assume the same amount of KE is lost by your car in both collisions.) Should the drivers hit the other car or the wall?
What if the masses or speeds would not be the same?

Welcome to the PF.

Is this a schoolwork question?
 
I saw this on a list of conceptual physics questions. Might be someone's schoolwork but not mine :)
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
How can this be proven mathmatically. Can it be done using energy conservation and momentum conservation?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top