Collision of two identical cars moving in opposite dirrections

  • Thread starter Thread starter mahela007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cars Collision
AI Thread Summary
In a collision between two identical cars moving in opposite directions, the injuries to passengers depend on the kinetic energy involved in the crash. If both collisions—against a brick wall and with another identical car—result in the same kinetic energy loss, the impact forces experienced by passengers would be similar. Analyzing the reference frames reveals that in a stationary frame, the cars come to a complete stop, while in a moving frame, they decelerate to half their speed. The forces experienced by passengers in both scenarios are effectively the same, leading to comparable injury outcomes. Thus, the nature of the collision does not significantly alter the potential for injury if kinetic energy loss is consistent.
mahela007
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
What would cause more injuries to the passengers of each car? [no a pleasant example, I know]
a) car colliding against brick wall.
b) car colliding with an identical car moving in the opposite direction at the same speed.

Does it have something to do with the amount of K.E liberated / lost?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the amount of kinetic energy lost in both cases is the same (like if it's completely elastic or completely inelastic, for example) then choices A and B are the same. You should also assume the cars are the same mass, there isn't much damage to a semi when it hits a sub-compact.

One of the ways to think about this problem is that in a reference frame at rest you slow down from your initial speed to zero. And in a reference frame moving with one of the cars, you slow down from your initial speed to half of your initial speed. The force you experience in each case is the same.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top