Classical mechanics - mass/spring attached to moving support

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass attached to a spring, with the spring's support oscillating. The participants are exploring the dynamics of the mass under the influence of gravitational force and the oscillating support, focusing on the motion of the mass relative to both the support and an inertial frame.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration process used to find the motion of the mass and question the validity of the derived equations. There is a focus on the assumptions made regarding the contributions to acceleration and the treatment of variables.

Discussion Status

Some participants have pointed out potential errors in the original equations and assumptions, suggesting that the motion of the mass must account for its own dynamics in addition to the support's motion. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct formulation of the problem, with some guidance provided on the nature of the governing equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available and the methods permissible for solving the problem. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and corrections regarding the mathematical treatment of the problem.

ihatelolcats
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass, m, is attached to a support by a spring with spring constant, k. The mass is hanging down from the spring, so there is a gravitational force on the mass as well. Neglect any resistive or frictional force. The support is then oscillated with an amplitude of A and at a frequency of ωa .
a) Find the motion of the mass relative to the support.
b) Find the motion of the mass relative to the lab (inertial frame).


Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the motion of the mass relative to the support to be
x*=-kAcos(ωt)/(mt^2)-(gt^2)/2
by integrating twice
ma*=kAcos(ωt)-mg
which seems reasonable.

For part b, I said
x=x*+Acos(ωt)
so the motion of the mass relative to the lab
x=Acos(ωt)(1-k/(mt^2))-(gt^2)/2.
Is this valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You said that the support oscillates at a frequency of wa, (omega times a). What is a? Was it just a miss-type?

Also, for part a, I don't think you integrated cosine correctly. why does t^2 end up on the denominator of the integrated function?
 
You are correct, the frequency is just w. And it should be ω^2 instead of t^2 in the denominator.
So the answer to part b is changed to
x=Acos(ωt)(1-k/(mω^2))-(gt^2)/2.
 
Unfortunately, its not so simple. This equation: ma*=kAcos(ωt)-mg is wrong. It assumes that the only contribution to the relative acceleration is due to the support moving, but the mass will have motion also.

Sorry I didn't say this in my first post, but I had only looked through your work for obvious errors. Another reason to be suspicious of your answer is that as t gets larger, x approaches minus infinity! This is not a realistic solution, so it should hint to you that your assumptions were incorrect.

The true equation representing this situation is an inhomogeneous 2nd-order differential equation. To get the equation, just think about the position of the support and position of the mass as two separate variables (to begin with), and you know the equation for the force on the mass due to relative distance between mass and support. Then you can see the position of the mass as the dependent variable and the position of the support as simply the inhomogeneous part of the equation. From there you need to solve the complementary function and particular integral, which eventually gives you the solution.

There are probably short-cut ways of doing all this, but this is the standard way that is shown in most textbooks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K