Combination of Michelson/Morley and Time Dilation

olli
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I found myself trapped in a question on Special Relativity for 15 years now. Because of other new theories (LQG) the question became actual for me again. Maybe some of you can give me anwer on it: Is the combination of the experiments "Michelson and Morley experiment" and "Time Dilation" is testing something different, or is it just the same ?

1. The Michelson and Morley experiment intended to measure the velocity of the Earth relative to the “lumeniferous æther”. It failed, because SR prediction of Light-Speed Isotropy was correct.

2. Time Dilation experiments showed that particle lifetimes are showing relativistic time dilation.

As far as I know, the limited lifetime of e.g. mesons is caused by the weak interaction, a fundamental force. The mean life is depending on the relativic effects caused by the high speed. If the decay process is obeserved by a different inertial system, does the expectation of the mean life follow the Special Relativity ?

For illustration, please imagine the following new experiment:
- We create a lot of pions with a particle accelerator.
- We measure the direction and decay of the pions in space (according to current direction of earth).
- we do not measure the velocity

I feel the pions does not care about the speed of an observer. The EPR paradox on Quantum entanglement showed that Relativity can still be unaffected on larger scales, if it is not based on information exchange. Does the direction of the pions has no measureable effect on the mean life ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
olli said:
I feel the pions does not care about the speed of an observer.
That is correct, they do not. In their own frame they decay at the same rate regardless of any observers.

If one observer said, "the pion is traveling 3m/s to the right and 4m/s forward", and if another observer said, "no, the pion is traveling 5m/s forward" would the pions care? Of course not. Would you even say that the observers disagreed? You might, they certainly use different numbers to describe the same thing, but if you asked them a question that was independent of the coordinate system they would always agree.

The point of relativity is just that a time of 1s later is as dependent on the observer as a direction of 1m right.
 
olli said:
As far as I know, the limited lifetime of e.g. mesons is caused by the weak interaction, a fundamental force. The mean life is depending on the relativic effects caused by the high speed. If the decay process is obeserved by a different inertial system, does the expectation of the mean life follow the Special Relativity ?
The mean life for such particles do not depend on relativistic effects. However an outside observer's measurement of duration may not agree with the actual lifetime due to relativistic effects.
 
DaleSpam said:
That is correct, they do not. In their own frame they decay at the same rate regardless of any observers.

Thank you! that's the point.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top