Combinatorial Proof: Solving (n C k)= (n-1 C k) + (n-1 C k-1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big-oh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the combinatorial identity (n C k) = (n-1 C k) + (n-1 C k-1). The original poster seeks a combinatorial proof, expressing confusion about how the two sides relate in terms of counting subsets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the identity by considering the implications of including or excluding a specific object from the selection. They discuss partitioning the problem based on whether a particular object is included in the chosen subsets.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the reasoning behind the identity, suggesting a focus on the inclusion or exclusion of specific objects. However, there remains a request for clarification on proving the identity by induction, indicating that the discussion is ongoing and not yet resolved.

Contextual Notes

One participant mentions having encountered this identity on a test, highlighting a potential gap in understanding the proof techniques, particularly induction. This suggests that the discussion may also involve addressing different methods of proof beyond combinatorial reasoning.

Big-oh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the identity:

(n C k) = (n-1 C k) + (n-1 C k-1)

*C means choose. So (n C k) is just n choose k.

Give a combinatorial proof of this identity.The left side means counting the number of ways of choosing k-elements from an n-element list.

But the right side means counting the number of ways of choosing k-elements from an n-1-element list, and adding that to counting the number of ways of choosing k-1-elements from an n-1-element list. I don't see how this relates to the left side.

I have a feeling I just need to partition the right side correctly, but I don't know how I would do it... No full solutions required, a small hint would be fine :D
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Label the n objects 1,2,3,...,n. Consider object no. 1.

LHS = no. of ways to choose k of these n objects

For RHS, consider the following argument. In each choice of k objects either object no. 1 is there or it isn't. Consider both cases separately.
 
I think I might have it, I'm just going to use object number n, because it seems to make more sense to me.

Alright so for the RHS:

If S represents the subsets that (n-1 C k) counts, all the elements in S should intersect with the left-side.

Now. In (n-1 C k), any subset in (n C k) that included the object number n wasn't counted (Because it wasn't present), so to "make up" for that, we have to find the ways we can count k-elements in a n-element list, but since object number n always has to be present (To make up for it), we only pick from an n-1-element list.

Is this correct?
 
that's correct.
 
Sorry to raise this up so late.

I just had this on a test and didn't get it.
I still don't understand how one is supposed to prove it by induction.

Any help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K