Proving the Commutator Relationship with Power Series Expansion | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter cahill8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the commutator relationship \([x, f(p)] = i\hbar \frac{d}{dp}(f(p))\) using power series expansion. Participants utilize the commutator identities \([A, BC] = [A,B]C + B[A,C]\) and \([A, B+C] = [A,B] + [A,C]\) to manipulate the expression. The power series expansion \(f(p) = \Sigma f_{n}p^{n}\) is applied to derive the necessary relationships, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the approach is valid and effective for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics commutation relations
  • Familiarity with power series expansions in mathematical physics
  • Knowledge of differential calculus, specifically derivatives with respect to momentum
  • Experience with manipulating algebraic expressions involving operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the application of power series in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
  • Investigate the role of operators in quantum mechanics and their algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with operator algebra, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

cahill8
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show \left[x,f(p)\right)] = i\hbar\frac{d}{dp}(f(p))\right.


Homework Equations



I can use \left[x,p^{n}\right)] = i\hbar\\n\right.p^{n}\right.
f(p) = \Sigma f_{n}p^{n} (power series expansion)


The Attempt at a Solution


I started by expanding f(p) to the power series which makes

\left[x,\Sigma\\f_{n}\\p^{n}\right)]

and I know I must use the commutator identity [A, BC] = [A,B]C + B[A,C]
but the power series cannot be split up into two products(BC) ? So I'm not sure how to go on
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cahill8 said:
and I know I must use the commutator identity [A, BC] = [A,B]C + B[A,C]
How do you know that?
 
In a textbook it says it can be shown using that equation

Trying a different method:

[x, f(p)] = [x,\sum_{n}\\f_{n}p^{n}] = [x,fnpn + \sum_{n-1}\\f_{n}p^{n}]

using [A, B+C] = [A,B] + [A,C]

= [x, fnpn] + [x, \sum_{n-1}\\f_{n}p^{n}]

using [A, BC] = C[A,B] + B[A,C]

= fn[x, pn] + pn[x, fn] + [x, \sum_{n-1}\\f_{n}p^{n}]

using [x, pn] = i\hbarnpn-1

= fni\hbarnpn-1 + pn[x, fn] + [x, \sum_{n-1}\\f_{n}p^{n}]

[x, fn] = 0 as fn is a const.

= fni\hbarnpn-1 + [x, \sum_{n-1}\\f_{n}p^{n}]

am I on the right track?
 
Last edited:
I'm curious why you used
[A, rC] = [A,r]C + r[A,C]​
to pull out a scalar, rather than just using
[A, rC] = r [A,C]​

I'm also curious why you stopped using
[A, B + C] = [A,B] + [A,C]​
after a single addition.

But that aside, everything you wrote looks correct. We won't know if you're on the right track until we see where this path leads, though!
 
I see what you mean. [x, fnpn] = fn[x, pn] is fine.

I kept going with the addition and noticed a pattern and managed to solve it. Thanks for the hints :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K