MHB Compact Topological Spaces .... Stromberg, Example 3.34 (c) .... ....

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how to rigorously demonstrate that the collection of open intervals, denoted as $$\mathscr{I}$$, forms a cover for the closed interval $$[a,b]$$ as presented in Example 3.34 (c) of Stromberg's "An Introduction to Classical Real Analysis." It is established that since $$\mathscr{U}$$ is an open cover of $$[a,b]$$, for each point $$x$$ in $$[a,b]$$, there exists an open set $$U$$ in $$\mathscr{U}$$ containing $$x$$. Consequently, an open interval $$I_x$$ can be found such that $$x$$ is in $$I_x$$ and $$I_x$$ is a subset of $$U$$, thus confirming that $$I_x$$ belongs to $$\mathscr{I}$$. This leads to the conclusion that $$[a,b]$$ is indeed contained within the union of the intervals in $$\mathscr{I}$$, satisfying the criteria for a cover. The application of the Heine-Borel Theorem further supports this argument.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Karl R. Stromberg's book: "An Introduction to Classical Real Analysis". ... ...

I am focused on Chapter 3: Limits and Continuity ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand an aspect of Example 3.34 (c) on page 102 ... ... Examples 3.34 (plus some relevant definitions ...) reads as follows:

View attachment 9122

In Example 3.34 (c) above from Stromberg we read the following:

" ... ... Let $$\mathscr{I}$$ be the collection of all open intervals $$I$$ such that $$I \subset U$$ for some $$U$$ in $$\mathscr{U}$$. Check that $$\mathscr{I}$$ is a cover of $$[a,b]$$ ... ... "

My question is as follows:

How would we go about (rigorously) checking that $$\mathscr{I}$$ is a cover of $$[a,b]$$ ... ... indeed how would we rigorously demonstrate that $$\mathscr{I}$$ is a cover of $$[a,b]$$ ... ... ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

***EDIT***

My thoughts ... after reflecting ...$$\mathscr{U}$$ is an open cover (family of open subsets) of $$[a, b]$$ ... ...

Each set $$U \subset \mathscr{U} $$ is a countable set of pairwise disjoint open intervals ... ... (Theorem 3.18)

Therefore if $$\mathscr{I}$$ equals the collection of all open intervals $$I$$ such that $$I \subset U$$ ...

... then $$ \mathscr{I} $$ is a family of open intervals such that $$[a, b] \subset \bigcup \mathscr{I}$$ ...

Now apply Heine-Borel Theorem ...Is that correct?---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hope someone can help ...

Peter
========================================================================The above text from Stromberg mentions the Heine_Borel Theorem ... so I am proving the text of the (statement of ...) the theorem ... ... as follows:
View attachment 9123
"My thoughts ... ... " above include a reference to Theorem 3.18 ... the text of the statement of Theorem 3.18 is as follows:
View attachment 9124
View attachment 9125
Hope that helps ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Stromberg - Example 3.34 (c) ...  .png
    Stromberg - Example 3.34 (c) ... .png
    30.5 KB · Views: 135
  • Stromberg -  Statement of Heine-Borel Theorem 1.66 ... .png
    Stromberg - Statement of Heine-Borel Theorem 1.66 ... .png
    4.6 KB · Views: 121
  • Stromberg - 1 - Statement of Theorem 3.18 ... PART 1 ... .png
    Stromberg - 1 - Statement of Theorem 3.18 ... PART 1 ... .png
    6.3 KB · Views: 128
  • Stromberg - 2 - Statement of Theorem 3.18 ... PART 2  ... .png
    Stromberg - 2 - Statement of Theorem 3.18 ... PART 2 ... .png
    2.1 KB · Views: 148
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let $x\in[a,\,b]$. Then $x\in U$ for some $U\in\mathscr U$. As $U$ is open, there is an open interval $I_x$ such that $x\in I_x\subseteq U$. So $I_x\in\mathscr I$ and $[a,\,b]\subseteq\bigcup_xI_x$, i.e. $\mathscr I$ is a cover for $[a,\,b]$.
 
Olinguito said:
Let $x\in[a,\,b]$. Then $x\in U$ for some $U\in\mathscr U$. As $U$ is open, there is an open interval $I_x$ such that $x\in I_x\subseteq U$. So $I_x\in\mathscr I$ and $[a,\,b]\subseteq\bigcup_xI_x$, i.e. $\mathscr I$ is a cover for $[a,\,b]$.


Thanks for the help Olinguito

Peter
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K