Comparing coefficients of polynomial congruences.

Yuqing
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
Today I read about the AKS - Primality test in which the simple theorem

For gcd(a, n) = 1, we have
(X - a)^n\equiv X^n - a\ (mod\ n)if and only if n is prime.

was proven. The if direction is quite trivial from the fact that \binom{p}{k}\equiv 0\ (mod\ p) for 1\leq k < p. The other direction comes as follows (sketch):

Suppose (X - a)^n\equiv X^n - a\ (mod\ n) and that n was composite. Let p be a prime divisor of n and p^k the largest power of p which divides n. Then p^k does not divide \binom{n}{p^k} so we have on the left a coefficient of x^{p^k} which is non-zero and on the right a coefficient which is 0. By comparison of coefficients, we reach a contradiction.

The problem I have with the proof is the last step, the comparison of coefficients. I thought that this cannot be done in general with congruences. This brings me to a more general question which is: When can comparison of coefficients be done for congruent polynomials.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your question is: When are we allowed to conclude ##\mu a^m \equiv \nu a^m \,\operatorname{mod} n \Longrightarrow \mu \equiv \nu \,\operatorname{mod}n\,?##

The equation lives in the ring ##\mathbb{Z}_n##, so the question is: When is ##a^m \in \mathbb{Z}_n## a unit, in which case we can cancel it and are left with ##\mu \equiv \nu\,\operatorname{mod}n\,.## And ##a^m## is a unit, if it is coprime to ##n##. Since ##(a,n)=1## are coprime, so are ##(a^{(p^k)},n)=1\,.## Here we use, that ##\binom{n}{p^k}## is the coefficient at ##a^{(p^k)}\,.##
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top