Comparing Magnetic Attraction: Iron vs. Opposite Polarity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RestlessMind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iron Polarity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing the magnetic attraction between a magnet and a piece of iron versus the attraction between two magnets with opposite polarities. Participants explore the nature of magnetic forces, propose experimental setups, and share calculations related to the strength of these attractions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the force of attraction between a magnet and iron (i) may be less than or equal to the force of attraction between two magnets (p), with suggestions that p could equal 2i.
  • Others argue that the attraction of the original magnet remains unchanged when near iron, but combines with the attraction of the second magnet, potentially leading to a greater overall force.
  • One participant suggests a method involving a digital balance to measure the weight change of a magnet when attracted to iron and compares it to the attraction of another magnet.
  • Another participant speculates that for soft iron and small distances, the forces might not differ significantly, as the iron would behave like another magnet, but this may change with distance or different materials.
  • Some participants share links to resources for purchasing scales and magnets, as well as alternative methods for comparing magnet strengths.
  • A later reply presents calculations indicating that the attraction between two magnets can be greater than that between a magnet and steel, depending on the dimensions and materials used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the forces of attraction in the scenarios presented. There is no consensus on whether i equals p, or if one is greater than the other, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific conditions such as the type of iron used, the distance between magnets, and the dimensions of the magnets, which may affect the outcomes of the proposed experiments and calculations.

RestlessMind
Messages
173
Reaction score
0
Lets say I take the North pole of a magnet and place it 1 inch from a mass of iron with the same density and shape of the magnet, and somehow measure the force of attraction, I'll label that value "i". And then I take that same magnet and place it the same distance from another identical magnet with the South pole facing the first magnet's North pole, and measure the force of attraction, I'll label that value "p".

Does i = p or is i < p ? Perhaps p = 2i?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'm certainly no expert in this stuff, but I have an intuitive answer that might or might not be correct. It seems to me that the attraction of the original magnet doesn't change at all. It will, however, combine with the attraction of the second magnet to multiply the overall attraction.
 
Yes, I think the attraction will be 2i, because I know that if two identical magnets are placed N to S and allowed to connect that the resulting field is the sum of the two fields, or at least, not much less. Kind of like two batteries.
 
There is an easy way to prove what happens.

If you have access to a digital balance (scales) put the original magnet on a small cardboard or wooden box on the scales. The magnet should weigh the same with either pole pointed down. If it doesn't, the magnet is affecting the scale operation and the box needs to be bigger. Polystyrene or other plastic is OK. Anything light and nonmagnetic.
The magnet should now have one pole pointed up.

Zero (tare) the scales.

Then put the piece of iron in a clamp so that it is held at a fixed distance and bring it over the magnet.

The magnet will be attracted to the piece of iron and its weight will decrease. Get a distance where it decreases by about 30 %. Measure this distance.

Now substitute the other magnet with the opposite pole pointed down. This will be attracted to the first magnet and lift it so that it weighs less. At the same distance, check the lifting effect on the scales.

This is a very sensitive test to try out ideas. What happens if you put another magnet on top of the magnet in the clamp?

What if you substitute a solenoid with an iron core for the top magnet? How does the current in the solenoid affect its magnetism?

.
 
my guess is that for a very soft iron and small distances the forces would not differ much as the magnet would magnetize the iron and effectively the iron would behave as yet another magnet. but if you increase the distance or replace with a steel piece the magnet force wud be grater than the iron-magnet force.

anyway since you have thought about this idea, please do the measurements .. that is the way of science. idle theorizing blunts the mind and sharpens stupidity. please tell all of us about the results.
 
Well, vk6kro's idea sounds good, but I don't have any scales or identical magnets. But I think I could come up with something.
 
You might find a store that sells them cheaply, like this one in Hong Kong:
http://www.dealextreme.com/products.dx/category.406

They also sell magnets. Those prices are in US$ and include shipping. I'd get a 0.01 gram one.

Alternatively, phone your local high school and talk to their Science people. They would probably let you use a digital balance for a while.

A good way of comparing magnet strengths is to clamp one end of a hacksaw blade in a vice and try to pull the blade into a semicircle from the other end using the magnet. Very strong magnets will be able to pull a blade 90 degrees. If they let go almost immediately, they need remagnetizing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey, that's a cool place...
 
  • #10
Draven said:
Check this out guys: http://www.kjmagnetics.com/calculator.asp?calcType=block

It calculates that magnet-to-magnet and magnet-to-steel pounds of force are equal. Case closed I guess!

You should make a conclusion before closing a case. What cocnlusion did you make Draven?
 
  • #11
That (according to OP) i = p.
 
  • #12
Draven said:
That (according to OP) i = p.

Look closely at the curves as separation distance increases. It looks to me like p=i at small seperations and p>i at larger separation distances
 
  • #13
The original proposal was to place the magnet near iron and near another magnet. Not touching.
On that web site, I set the material to N52, the dimensions all to 1 inch and the spacing to 0.25 inches. That is pretty close.

I get 16.29 lb for magnet to steel and 30.69 lb for magnet to magnet.

So, for what it is worth, the two 1 inch cube magnets attract each other more than one magnet attracts steel and by about double.

However, if you make the dimensions all 2 inches, the situation reverses and you get 159 lb and 142 lb. Yuk!
They did use steel plate, though, and that was bigger than the magnets so maybe that was making the difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
452
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K