Comparing Optical Signal Power with RMS Voltage

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on comparing optical signal power with RMS voltage in a CW laser system equipped with 32 channels for both source and detector. Participants highlight the importance of understanding signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in pulse width modulated signals, emphasizing that RMS voltage is modulation-dependent. Key calculations include converting RMS background noise to peak-peak noise and using the formula SNR (dB) = 20 * log (peak-peak_mod / peak-peak_noise) for analysis. The LTC5507 low frequency peak power detector is recommended for monitoring output strength.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pulse width modulation (PWM) in optical systems
  • Familiarity with RMS voltage calculations and oscilloscope usage
  • Knowledge of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and its significance
  • Basic principles of optical signal detection and measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the LTC5507 low frequency peak power detector for output monitoring
  • Learn about advanced RMS voltage measurement techniques in optical systems
  • Explore methods for calculating signal-to-noise ratio in multiplexed signals
  • Investigate the effects of fiber optic cable changes on signal integrity
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, laser system developers, and technicians involved in signal processing and measurement in optical communication systems.

daniel1211
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
I have a CW laser system, the optical detector receives a pulse width modulated signal and converts it to an analog signal. Both the source and detector have 32 channels and I would like to know what the analog signal power is, I thought maybe I could use the RMS voltage received on the oscilloscope and convert that to dB. I can then compare the input and output signals, is this possible?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Good question!

In most applications, you wish to understand what your signal to noise ratio is which is simple if your modulation is simple. Mulitplexed and pulsed modulation schemes become very difficult as the RMS voltage is dependent upon your modulation.

You may wish to look at the RMS background noise and multiply it by 6.6 to convert that to a peak-peak background noise.
Then, measure your peak-to-peak from modulation.

SNR (dB) = 20 * log (peak-peak_mod / peak-peak_noise)

For a part to do monitor your output strength, you may wish to look into the LTC5507 low frequency peak power detector.

Fun project. I used to mux signals in high school, and acquired a fiber optic link in college to send stereo using PWM :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: daniel1211
daniel1211 said:
I have a CW laser system, the optical detector receives a pulse width modulated signal and converts it to an analog signal. Both the source and detector have 32 channels and I would like to know what the analog signal power is, I thought maybe I could use the RMS voltage received on the oscilloscope and convert that to dB. I can then compare the input and output signals, is this possible?
I think you mean the signal power of one analogue output. If the modulation is sinusoidal, you can find the RMS voltage using an oscilloscope. You must have the correct load resistor in place. Then the power in the load (Pr) is Vrms^2 / R. If wanted, you can then measure the analogue signal power into the TX (Pt) in a similar way (you need to know the input resistance). If you want overall loss in decibels it is 10 log (Pt/Pr).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: daniel1211
This type of signal is an asymmetric pulse rather than sine wave. Essentially, you cannot have a "negative" amount of light. Peak-Peak measurements are more applicable.
However, if your sensor's output reflects cable power, then the 10 log (Vout / Vnoise) reflects the signal to noise in terms of cable power.
If your addressing the noise power in terms of output voltage, then the 20 log(Vout / Vnoise).
Tech99's suggestion holds valid for computing the effects of fiber changes (i.e. more cable), so I suspect it is most valid.
Mike
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: daniel1211
Thanks everyone for your help, I was able to reproduce the results while testing my systems which allowed me to easily determine the quality of the analog output signal. One issue that I ran into was that some of the channels on the laser detectors were sending out inverse signals but when looking at the RMS on the oscilloscope based off my calculations the signal should of been correct. I decided to take the ratio of the RMS and the amplitude which allowed me to correct this issue.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K