Comparing Wheel Speeds for Traction Control

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on comparing methods for calculating wheel speed differences for traction control. Two primary options are presented: using an optical encoder to generate a pulse train and a DC motor acting as a generator to measure RPM. The consensus is that the optical encoder offers superior accuracy due to its high precision angle readout capabilities. Participants emphasize the importance of using an operational amplifier (OP amp) for voltage difference measurement in both methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical encoders and their applications in speed measurement
  • Knowledge of operational amplifiers (OP amps) and their role in signal processing
  • Familiarity with microcontroller (uC) programming for processing sensor data
  • Basic principles of DC motors and their use as generators
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and implementation of high-precision optical encoders
  • Explore advanced signal processing techniques using operational amplifiers
  • Learn about microcontroller interfacing with sensors for real-time data processing
  • Investigate the use of DC motors in generating voltage for speed measurement
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and hobbyists working on traction control systems, automotive developers focusing on wheel speed measurement, and anyone interested in precision sensor applications in embedded systems.

lakmalp
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am experimenting with traction controlling of wheels. I have to calculate the speed difference in two wheels (driven and non-driven). I am thinking of these options:

Code:
1. Generate pulse train using optical encoder -> binary counter -> D/A converter -> Take voltage difference using OP amp -> do processing in uC based on the voltage produced by OP amp.
2. Use of a DC motor (in this case a generator) to generate voltage corresponding to the RPM -> Take voltage difference using OP amp -> do processing in uC based on the voltage produced by OP amp.

I have attached a schematic of my project as a pdf to this thread.

Please advice me as to what option would be most accurate or are there any other ways I can accomplish this.

Regards,
/Lakmal
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
Beyond a doubt, the optical encoder is more accurate. You do not need just a magnetic pickup, you can get a high precision angle readout from the optical encoder.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
53
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K