Comparison of attraction/repulsion measures

  • Thread starter Thread starter fer2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comparison
AI Thread Summary
To analyze the attraction/repulsion data across multiple matrices, a paired-comparison t-test or ANOVA is suggested, depending on the specifics of the data. The matrices are symmetrical, and the goal is to determine how closely the first matrix resembles the second compared to the third. The analysis must account for the size of the matrices, which are approximately 300 x 300. The time lapse between situations is not a concern, but consistency in external conditions is necessary for valid comparisons. Understanding the connection to quantum physics remains an open question in the discussion.
fer2000
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody!

I have a large set of items and, two-by-two, there exists some kind of attraction/repulsion that I have measured.
Under different circumstances this attraction/repulsion changes.
So, what kind of statistical/mathematical procedure can I use to measure whether the changes (for the whole set) are “large/small”, as well as if a subset of them (lets say the first ten items) the attraction is larger than in another subset (lets say the last ten items)?.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you should provide a much more detailed description of your experiment. My initial thought would be a paired-comparison t-test; possibly an ANOVA approach. Much depends on what you do -- if time is involved, then the analysis can be tricky because of possible autocorrelations. Details, details, details.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Hello, first of all, thanks for your answer.
The situation is as follows,

My data are comprised in different matrices (each of the situations provide that information).
First one
x 1.3 -1.5 . . . . . .
1.3 x 1.2 . . . . . .
-1.5 1.2 x . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Second one
x 1.1 1.3 . . . . . .
1.1 x -0.2 . . . . . .
1.3 -0.2 x . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


Third one
x -0.1 0.3 . . . . . .
-0.1 x 0.4 . . . . . .
0.3 0.4 x . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


All of them are symmetrical and the diagonal does not make sense (I could write any number). Note that the dimension will be around 300 x 300 for each matrix.

How can I say if first one is closer (and how closer is) to second one than to third one (as well as any other combination)?
I do not mind the lapse of time between each of the situations (that provide each of the matrices), but an external condition that is the same for all the pairs that generate the matrix.


Thanks again.
 
Just out of curiosity, what is the connection of this with quantum physics?
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top