Comparison of Riemann integral to accumulation function

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
TopCat
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Let f:[0,1]→ℝ be an increasing function. Show that for all x in (0,1],

[tex]\frac{1}{x}\int_{0}^{x}f (t) \,dt \le \int_{0}^{1}f (t) \,dt[/tex]


So by working backwards I got to trying to show that [itex](1-x)\int_{0}^{1}f (t) \,dt \le \int_{x}^{1}f (t) \,dt[/itex]. While I know both sides are equal at x=1, the LHS is decreasing, and the RHS is continuous, I haven't been able to find a reason to say the inequality is true (probably nothing there).

Should I pass to considering upper and lower sums, or is there some fancy way to use integration by parts here? I haven't come across anything compelling in all my random scratch work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how about something like this...

f is increasing so
f(a)<f(b) for all a<b (strictly increasing?)

now say f(x) = c, can you show
[tex](1-x)c<\int_x^1 f(t) dt[/tex]
[tex]\int_0^x f(t) dt < xc[/tex]

the second gives
[tex]\frac{1}{x}\int_0^x f(t) dt < c[/tex]
 
Last edited:
also it may help to think of it like this

[itex]\frac{1}{x}\int_{0}^{x}f (t) \,dt[/itex] is the average value of the function over the interval [0,x]

[itex]\int_{0}^{1}f (t) \,dt[/itex] is the average value of the function over the interval [0,1]

As the function is increasing, so will its average increase over a larger interval
 
Thanks for the intuition. Now I was able to easily get the inequality

[tex]\frac{1}{x}\int^{x}_{0}f\,dt \le \frac{1}{1-x}\int^{1}_{x}f\,dt[/tex]

but I'm not sure how that can show the LHS ≤ [itex]\int^{1}_{0}f\,dt[/itex]. I'm sure I'm being blind and missing something super obvious. :(