MATLAB Comparisons of Mathematica, MapleSoft and MatLab

  • Thread starter Thread starter LouMazero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica Matlab
AI Thread Summary
When comparing Mathematica, Maple, and MATLAB for learning higher math and physics, Mathematica is favored for its extensive capabilities and refinement, particularly in symbolic computation. While Maple has improved since its earlier instability, Mathematica remains the preferred choice for many due to its vast array of packages that cater to various mathematical needs. MATLAB, on the other hand, is primarily numeric and not symbolic, making it less suitable for symbolic math compared to Mathematica. Although MATLAB does offer some symbolic packages, they do not match the sophistication of Mathematica's offerings. Overall, Mathematica is recommended for those focused on symbolic mathematics, while MATLAB is better suited for numerical analysis and engineering applications.
LouMazero
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am looking to invest some time into learning one of these programs, higher math and physics, can someone contrast and compare these programs, strengths/weaknesses etc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like Mathematica best, but I made my choice back when Maple was really unstable. Really MatLab is a different thing entirely since it is just numeric and not symbolic. I wouldn't put them on the same list, I would put MatLab on a list with IDL instead.
 
Matlab DOES have symbolic packages, but it is nowhere near mathematica's level of refinement. Mathematica also has a crazy amount of packages for all different things.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top