Compatibility of Determinism & CTC in General Relativity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jk22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinism
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the compatibility of determinism and closed timelike curves (CTCs) within the framework of General Relativity (GR). Participants explore the implications of determinism on the behavior of vectors during parallel transport along closed curves and the nature of curvature in spacetime.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if determinism is accepted, then the end and start vectors in a parallel transport test should be the same, implying no curvature exists.
  • Another participant clarifies that the closed curve used for parallel transport is not equivalent to a closed timelike curve and that curvature can be tested in any spacetime, regardless of the presence of CTCs.
  • A different participant argues that determinism in GR means the entire 4-dimensional spacetime geometry is determined by initial data, and does not impose requirements on the behavior of vectors during parallel transport.
  • Another participant emphasizes that determinism states every physical observable is uniquely defined at every event, but the values of the vector before and after parallel transport do not represent different values of the same observable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the implications of determinism on the parallel transport of vectors and the interpretation of curvature in relation to CTCs. No consensus is reached on these points.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights technicalities surrounding the definitions of determinism and the nature of physical observables in GR, as well as the distinction between closed curves for curvature testing and closed timelike curves.

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
GR makes use of the Riemann tensor itself using parellel transport along a closed curve.

Now GR says the 4th dimension were time, hence the vector comes to the same time and place it begun on the loop.

Now if determinism is admitted then at every time every quantity is defined uniquely at every place.

So if this determinism is admitted the end and start vector should be the same and hence there should be no curvature ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thread title references CTCs, which are closed timelike curves, but that is not what your question is about. The closed curve around which we parallel transport a vector to see if it changes (a change shows a nonzero Riemann curvature tensor) is not the same thing as a closed timelike curve in particular spacetimes that have them (like the Godel universe). You can do the parallel transport test for curvature in any spacetime, whether it has CTCs or not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pines-demon
jk22 said:
if this determinism is admitted the end and start vector should be the same

No. That is not what determinism says.

Determinism, as applied to GR, says that the entire 4-d spacetime geometry is determined by an appropriate set of initial data. (Note that there are quite a few technicalities here, some of which involve CTCs; but, as I noted in my previous post, your question actually has nothing to do with CTCs.) It also says that the worldline of any object in the spacetime is determined by an appropriate set of initial conditions. But the closed curve around which you do the parallel transport of a vector to test for curvature is not the worldline of any particle (although individual portions of it may be the worldlines of different particles). So determinism does not impose any requirement on what happens to the vector in the parallel transport test.
 
jk22 said:
if determinism is admitted then at every time every quantity is defined uniquely at every place

No, that is not what determinism says. Determinism says that every physical observable is uniquely defined at every event. But the two different values of the vector before and after being parallel transported around the loop in the parallel transport test are not two different values of the same physical observable. (They could be values of different physical observables.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
8K