Complete the parametric equation for the line where the planes cross

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around completing the parametric equation for the line where two planes intersect. The subject area includes vector calculus and geometry, particularly focusing on the properties of planes and their intersections.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of cross-products to find a vector parallel to the line of intersection and the confusion surrounding the coordinates derived from the plane equations. There are questions about the correctness of the plane equations and their interpretations, particularly regarding a potential typographical error in the second plane's equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning the assumptions made about the plane equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for normal vectors instead of unit vectors, and there is a call for the original poster to clarify their work to facilitate further assistance.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the correct formulation of the second plane's equation, with suggestions that it may contain typographical errors. The lack of a y-coordinate in the first plane's equation is also noted as a point of confusion.

MP97
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Complete the parametric equation for the line where the planes cross.
Relevant Equations
Plane 1: x-12z=-36
Plane 2: -11x16y-14z=-30

Note: the first parametric equation is given as x(t)=-72t
First, I use the unit vector of each plane, and I compute their cross-product to obtain a vector parallel to the line of interception.

Then, I algebraically use x=0 to obtain the coordinates of the point in the line of interception. However, not having a y coordinate in plane one is confusing me.
 
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems you're missing a sign in Plane 2. Also, please use Latex for your Math content.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
MP97 said:
Homework Statement: Complete the parametric equation for the line where the planes cross.
Relevant Equations: Plane 1: x-12z=-36
Plane 2: -11x16y-14z=-30

Note: the first parametric equation is given as x(t)=-72t
You haven't mentioned how this equation will come into play.
MP97 said:
First, I use the unit vector of each plane, and I compute their cross-product to obtain a vector parallel to the line of interception.
You don't need a unit vector for each plane, but you do need a normal vector for each one.
MP97 said:
Then, I algebraically use x=0 to obtain the coordinates of the point in the line of interception. However, not having a y coordinate in plane one is confusing me.
You can use the given equation of x as a function of t to solve for z in the first plane, and then use your equations of x and z as functions of t to solve for y in the second plane.

In any case, please show us what you have done.
 
MP97 said:
Complete the parametric equation for the line where the planes cross.
Plane 1: x-12z=-36
Ok the first one is a plane ...

##x-12z=-36##
##x+36=12z##
##\frac{x}{12}+\frac{36}{12}=z##
##z=\frac{x}{12}+3##

... parallel to the y axis
MP97 said:
Plane 2: -11x16y-14z=-30
An second "plane" is ...

##-11x16y-14z=-30 ##
##-176xy+30=14z##
##z= \frac{-176xy}{14}+\frac{30}{14}##

... is not a plane at all, but a saddle ( hyperbolic paraboloid )....

Wolfram Alpha -> https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=z=+\frac{-176xy}{14}+\frac{30}{14}

MP97 said:
Note: the first parametric equation is given as x(t)=-72t

First, I use the unit vector of each plane, and I compute their cross-product to obtain a vector parallel to the line of interception.

Then, I algebraically use x=0 to obtain the coordinates of the point in the line of interception. However, not having a y coordinate in plane one is confusing me.
... I don't understand the goal?
 
Bosko said:
Ok the first one is a plane ...

##x-12z=-36##

... parallel to the y axis

An second "plane" is ...

##-11x16y-14z=-30 ##
##-176xy+30=14z##
##z= \frac{-176xy}{14}+\frac{30}{14}##

... is not a plane at all, but a saddle ( hyperbolic paraboloid )....
Very likely, there is a typographical error in the equation for the second plane. Probably it should be
##\displaystyle -11x+16y-14z=-30 \ \ ## or ##\displaystyle \ \ -11x-16y-14z=-30 ##.

If OP had shown us any significant amount of his work on this problem, the correct equation would have been evident.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and Bosko
SammyS said:
Very likely, there is a typographical error in the equation for the second plane. Probably it should be
##\displaystyle -11x+16y-14z=-30 \ \ ## or ##\displaystyle \ \ -11x-16y-14z=-30 ##.

If OP had shown us any significant amount of his work on this problem, the correct equation would have been evident.
I had asked for clarification in that respect too.
 
Bosko said:
##-11x16y-14z=-30 ##
I'm 99.44% certain that the equation above is missing a '+' sign between -11x and 16y.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bosko and SammyS
Mark44 said:
I'm 99.44% certain that the equation above is missing a '+' sign between -11x and 16y.
Me to, either + or - sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K