Complex Integration - Poles on the Imaginary axis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral I_1 = ∫₀^∞ (dx / (x² + 1)) can be evaluated using complex analysis by integrating around a semicircle in the upper half-plane. The transformation to a complex variable z leads to I_2 = ∫₋∞^{∞} (dz / ((z+i)(z-i))), which contains a pole at z=i. By applying the residue theorem, the residue R(i) = 1/(2i) yields I_2 = π. Since the original integral ranges from 0 to infinity, the final result is I_1 = π/2, confirming that the integral must be divided by 2 due to the limits of integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Residue theorem application
  • Contour integration techniques
  • Understanding of analytic functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Jordan's Lemma in contour integration
  • Learn about the properties of even functions in complex analysis
  • Explore trigonometric substitutions in integral calculus
  • Investigate advanced techniques in evaluating improper integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in complex analysis and integral calculus, particularly those focusing on contour integration and the residue theorem.

knowlewj01
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



evaluate the integral:
I_1 =\int_0^\infty \frac{dx}{x^2 + 1}

by integrating around a semicircle in the upper half of the complex plane.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



first i exchange the real vaiable x with a complex variable z & factorize the denominator. Also, the contour of integration is a semicircle with radius= infinity

I_2 = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dz}{(z+i)(z-i)}

the contour contains only the pole in the upper half, so from residue theorem we know:
I_2 = 2\pi i R(i)

where R(i) is the residue at the point z=i

R(i) = 1/(i+i) = 1/2i

Hence I_2 = \pi

Now, i know the answer to the original integral is supposed to be pi/2.
Can i say that: because the original limits range from 0 to infinity, and i have integrated twice this amount, my answer should be divided by 2? or is this reasoning flawed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I THINK you do divide by two, as noted, but how I'd approach this would be by using trig substitution, substituting x = tan(θ). :P But yep, I think your reasoning's right, or at least close!
 
knowlewj01;3886693 Now said:
Yes.
 
Thanks for the replies. Is this because the function is even in the upper half of the complex plane?

I thought of doing this by integrating a contour in only the positive quadrent, ie:
(0,0) to (R,0)
(R,0) to (0,iR) along contour ω [a radial path of radius R from the real axis to the imaginary axis in the positive quadrent]
(0,iR) to (0,i+δ) [where δ is a small value which we will take to 0 around the pole]
(0,i+δ) to (0,i-δ) along a contour λ [radial path of radius δ in the clockwise direction such that the pole is not included in the enclosed path]
(0,i-δ) to (0,0)

we have:

F(z) = \frac{1}{Z^2+1}=\frac{1}{(z+i)(z-i)}

\oint_C F(z)dz =\int_0^R F(z)dz + \int_\omega F(z)dz + \left[\int_{iR}^{i+\delta}F(z)dz+\int_{i-\delta}^0 F(z)dz\right] + \int_\lambda F(z)dz =0

as F(z) is analytic everywhere inside the contour we demand that the integral = 0 by Green's theorem.

we know from residue theorem that integration on the contour λ will give a contribution of -πiR(i) as it is counterclockwise (& where R(i) is the residue at i, which is 1/2i)

now let R→∞ and δ→0:

First: consider the integral along the contour ω, if we have z=Re^{i\theta}

\int_\omega F(z)dz = \int_\omega \frac{iRe^{i\theta}d\theta}{R^2e^{i2\theta} + 1}

\lim_{R \to \infty}\int_\omega \frac{iRe^{i\theta}d\theta}{R^2e^{i2\theta}+1}≈ \frac{1}{R}\int_\omega \frac{id\theta}{e^{i\theta}}=0

Is this correct? I thought Jordan's Lemma worked only for semicircles but this seems to give the same result.

we are left with:

\int_0^\infty F(z)dz + \int_{i\infty}^0 F(z)dz - \frac{\pi}{2} = 0

so i know that the integral along the imaginary axis must be 0 but I'm not sure how to prove it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K