Complex numbers - polar form - does this work (indices) ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties and manipulation of complex numbers in polar form, specifically focusing on the validity of certain formulas related to powers and roots of complex numbers. Participants explore the implications of these formulas and their applications, particularly in the context of cube roots and higher roots.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the formula for raising a complex number in polar form to a power, ( (x, a) )^n = (x^n, a * n), is true.
  • There is contention regarding the square root formula, with some participants stating that sqroot( (x, a) ) = (sqroot(x), a/2) is valid, while the alternative (sqroot(x), pi + a/2) is deemed false by others.
  • One participant proposes a similar formula for cube roots, suggesting multiple possible forms for the cube root of a complex number in polar form, including (xroot(3, x), a / 3), (xroot(3, x), pi - a/3), and (xroot(3, x), a + pi), but expresses uncertainty about the last form.
  • Another participant clarifies that the three cube roots can be expressed as (y, a/3), (y, (a+2pi)/3), and (y, (a+4pi)/3), where y is the cube root of x.
  • There is a discussion about the notation used for roots, with some participants finding it confusing and seeking clarification on its meaning.
  • One participant questions whether applying the fourth root to a complex number would yield four solutions or only two distinct answers, depending on the overlap of results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the power formula for complex numbers in polar form, but there is disagreement regarding the square root and cube root formulas, with multiple competing views presented. The discussion remains unresolved on some aspects, particularly regarding the notation and implications of higher roots.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the notation used for roots, which may lead to misunderstandings. Additionally, the discussion includes various assumptions about the representation of complex numbers in polar form that are not fully clarified.

JPC
Messages
204
Reaction score
1
Complex numbers - polar form - does this work (indices) ?

hey

i haven't studied in class complex numbers yet, but i know some of the basis , and i was wondering if something i saw in complex numbers was true :

polar form :
let 'a' be the angle
and x the length (dont know how to call it in english)
: (x, a)

ok so now is this true :

-> ( (x, a) )^n = (x^n, a * n)

-> sqroot( (x, a) ) = (sqroot(x), a/2) or (sqroot(x), pi + a/2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first formula is true. While for the second, the one following "or" is false.
 
dextercioby said:
The first formula is true. While for the second, the one following "or" is false.

JPC is correct. For angle a, to get nth roots, use (a+2kpi)/n for k=0,1,..,n-1.

Therefore for sqrt, need k=0,1.
 
ok , and now , is this true for cube root , i only checked it on xroot(3, i) yet :

polar :
xroot(3, (x, a) ) =

( xroot(3, x) , a / 3 )
or
( xroot(3, x) , pi - a/3 )
or
( xroot(3, x) , a + pi )

im especially not sure for the "( xroot(3, x) , a + pi )", because i can't really find a rule for it.
finding cube root of i :

(a+ bi)^3 = i :

a^3 - 3ab² = 0
3a²b - b^3 = 1

a ( a² - 3b²) = 0
a = 0 or a² = 3b²
a = sqroot(3) * b , or a = - sqroot(3)* b or a = 0

i replace in the second equation a² by 3b²
and find b = 1 / 2
and find a= sqroot(3) / 2

now, if a=0 , then we end up in the second equation with :
-b^3 = 1
b= -1

giving me 3 solutions :

+ sqroot(3) / 2 + 0.5i
or
- sqroot(3) / 2 + 0.5i
or
-i
 
polar :
xroot(3, (x, a) ) =

( xroot(3, x) , a / 3 )
or
( xroot(3, x) , pi - a/3 )
or
( xroot(3, x) , a + pi )
Your notation is very confusing:

In any case if (x,a) represents a number in polar coordinates, the three cube roots are
(y,a/3), (y,(a+2pi)/3),(y,(a+4pi)/3), where y is the cube root of x.
 
Oh yeah, works completely with cube root of i and others, thanks

c : an Imaginary Number)

Now maybe ill try xroot(4, c), with c = i

would it end up with 4 solutions , (do sqroot of c once, then do sqroot to each of the first sqroot answers) ?
or would there only be 2 answers ? (out of the 4 answers of that way, 2 by 2 they end up the same)
 
Now maybe ill try xroot(4, c), with c = i

Your notation is confusing - I have never seen anything like it. Could you explain what it means? If c is supposed to be angle, it has to be a real number.
 
well like square root of a number c is :
xroot(2, c)

if u have xroot(a, b) means :

...___
a \/ b

this notation is from my HP calculator
 
It looks like xroot(a,b) means (in standard notation) b1/a. Here b is any complex number, but the form of b has not be specified. There are two usual ways:

1) b=x+iy, where x and y are real.

2) b=r(eiz), where r is non-negative and z is an angle between 0 and 2pi.

The question I was trying to answer previously iinvolves using the second representation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K