Complex Potential Flow - Two Vortices offset from the Origin

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 4K views
squire636
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a. Determine the complex potential for two equal counter-rotating vortices with strength [itex]\Gamma[/itex], the positive one located at z=-a and the negative one at z=a.

b/ Show the shape of the streamlines for this case.

Homework Equations



z = x + iy = r*e^(i[itex]\theta[/itex])

W(z) = [itex]\Phi[/itex] + i[itex]\Psi[/itex]
where [itex]\Phi[/itex] is the potential function and [itex]\Psi[/itex] is the stream function

The Attempt at a Solution



a. This part is relatively easy. I know that the complex potential for a vortex at the origin is

i[itex]\Gamma[/itex]/(2*[itex]\pi[/itex]) * ln(z)

Therefore, for the two vortices, we will have:

W(z) = i[itex]\Gamma[/itex]/(2*[itex]\pi[/itex]) * ln((z+a)/(z-a))


b. This is where I start to have trouble. I need to separate W(z) into the real and imaginary parts, and then I know that the imaginary part is the stream function. However, I don't know how to do this. It is easy for a vortex at the origin, because then I would have

ln(z) = ln(r*e^(i[itex]\theta[/itex])) = ln(r) + i[itex]\theta[/itex]

However, the addition and subtraction of 'a' inside of the log is giving me a lot of trouble. I've tried to separate it every way that I can think of but haven't had any success. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To separate real and imaginary parts, it is easier to write the log as ln(z+a)-ln(z-a). In both cases, this is just a shift by +-a.
 
I tried that, but still did not make any progress.

ln(z+a) - ln(z-a)
ln(r*e^iθ + a) - ln(r*e^iθ - a)

Now what? I can't split it up into ln(r)+iθ anymore.
 
I'm sorry I don't quite follow you, could you explain in more detail? I'm unfamiliar with that notation. Thanks.
 
That is a notation I invented for your specific problem.

z+a can be written as ##z+a=r^+ e^{i \theta^+}## with some real values ##\theta^+## and ##r^+## - there are formulas how to convert an arbitrary complex number to that shape.
In the same way, z-a can be written as ##z-a=r^- e^{i \theta^-}## with some real values ##\theta^-## and ##r^-##.
 
Would I do something along these lines?

ln(z+a)
ln(r*e^iθ + a)
ln(r*cos(θ)+i*r*sin(θ) + a)
ln((r*cos(θ)+a) + i*r*sin(θ))

And then try to find a new r and θ in order to put this back into the form of r*e^iθ ? That doesn't seem to me like it will be possible, and I can't find the formulas that you mentioned. Are they available online somewhere?
 
That is possible.
and I can't find the formulas that you mentioned. Are they available online somewhere?
The standard formulas how you get r and θ if you have a complex number a+ib? They are everywhere.
 
I think I figured it out, thanks so much!