Complexifying an Integral: How to Solve Tricky Integrals Using Complex Numbers

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jellicorse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
jellicorse
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Watching a video on differential equations by Arthur Mattuck of MIT, I came across a method which was new to me for solving certain integrals, such as [tex]\int e^{-x}cos(x)dx[/tex] . part of the video is here:

Given that [tex]e^{ix}=cosx+isinx[/tex], this integral can be re-written as [tex]Re\int e^{ix}\cdot e^{-x}dx[/tex] = [tex]Re\int e^{x(-1+i)}dx[/tex] and integrated this way, avoiding the need for reduction formulas...

I have looked up a few examples of this and think I can understand it when cos(x) is part of the integral, but am unsure when it comes to sin(x).

There is a (now closed) thread on this forum https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=511534&highlight=complexifying+integral which I have been attempting to follow but I can't see quite how it works. I was wondering if anyone could help me to understand this.

The following is effectively the working from that post:

[tex]\int e^x sin2x dx[/tex]

=[tex]Re\int e^x \cdot e^{i(\frac{\pi}{2}-2x)}dx[/tex]

I can see that since the real part of polar co-ordinates is contained in the "cos(2x)" part, they have put the Sin(2x) in terms of Cos(2x) by subtracting it from [tex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex].

But I don't see how the next step is reached:

[tex]=Re\frac{i}{1-2i}e^{(1-2i)x}[/tex]


I'm not sure how they got to this, nor what the intermediate steps might be. If I was doing this, I would have gone along the lines of [tex]Re\int e^{x+i(\frac{\pi}{2}-2x)}dx[/tex]. While I can see that that expression doesn't look very attractive to try to integrate, I can not see how the author got to [tex]e^{(1-2)x}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jellicorse said:
Watching a video on differential equations by Arthur Mattuck of MIT, I came across a method which was new to me for solving certain integrals, such as [tex]\int e^{-x}cos(x)dx[/tex] . part of the video is here:

Given that [tex]e^{ix}=cosx+isinx[/tex], this integral can be re-written as [tex]Re\int e^{ix}\cdot e^{-x}dx[/tex] = [tex]Re\int e^{x(-1+i)}dx[/tex] and integrated this way, avoiding the need for reduction formulas...

I have looked up a few examples of this and think I can understand it when cos(x) is part of the integral, but am unsure when it comes to sin(x).


If you want sin(x), take the imaginary part of [itex]e^{ix}[/itex] instead of the real part.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
OK, thanks Pasmith...