Is Complexifying an Integral the Solution for Tricky Integrands?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HotMintea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of evaluating the integral \(\int \sin{x} \cos{x} e^x \, dx\) through the method of complexification. Participants explore when it is appropriate to apply this technique and the conditions under which the integrand can be expressed as the real part of a complex exponential function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the original poster's attempt to complexify the integral and question the validity of certain steps in the reasoning. There is a suggestion to use trigonometric identities to simplify the integrand. Others explore the effectiveness of complexification when the integrand can be expressed in a specific form.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's attempts and clarifying misconceptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of trigonometric identities and the conditions for successful complexification, although there is no explicit consensus on the final form of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential errors in the application of complexification and the interpretation of the integral, with some references to external computational tools for verification.

HotMintea
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement

1.1. Is it possible to do [itex]\int\ sin{x}\, \ cos{x}\, \ e^x\, \ dx\[/itex] by complexifying the integral? (Note: not by integration by parts.)

Complexifying the Integral (Arthur Mattuck, MIT) [9:23]


1.2. When is it appropriate to complexify an integral, beside the condition that the integrand can be expressed as [itex]Re (\ e^{\alpha x})\, \[/itex]?

2. The attempt at a solution

2.1.

[tex]\begin{equation*} <br /> \begin{split} <br /> \int\ sin{x}\, \ cos{x}\, \ e^{x}\, \ dx\ =\\<br /> \int\ Re(\ e^{i(\frac{\pi}{2}\ -\ x)}\ )\, \ Re(\ e^{ix})\, \ e^{x}\ dx\ =\\<br /> Re\int\ e^{i(\frac{\pi}{2}\ -\ x)}\, \ e^{ix}\, \ e^{x}\ dx\ =\\<br /> Re\int\ i\ e^x\, \ dx\ =\\<br /> - Im( e^x )\ + \ C\, \, (?) <br /> \end{split} <br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi HotMintea! :smile:

You've made a mistake in your solution. You seem to think that Re(z)Re(z')=Re(zz'), but this is not the case. The real part doesn't behave that way. Thus you cannot say

[tex]Re(e^{i(\pi/2-x)})Re(e^{ix})=Re(e^{i(\pi/2-x)+ix})[/tex]

Instead, it would be better to use some trigonometric formula's in the beginning:

[tex]\sin(x)\cos(x)=\frac{\sin(2x)}{2}[/tex]
 
Hi micromass! :smile:

Thank you for pointing out my mistake and also for the suggestion.

[tex] \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \int\ sin{x}\, \ cos{x}\, \ e^x\ dx\, = \, \frac{1}{2}\int\ sin{2x}\, \ e^x\ dx\, \ = \\ \frac{1}{2}\, \ Re\int\ e^{i(\frac{\pi}{2} - 2x)}\, \ e^x\, \ dx\, = \, \ \frac{1}{2}\ Re(\frac{i}{1-2i}\ e^{(1-2i)x})\, \ + \, \ C\, \ = \\ \frac{1}{10}\ e^x\ Re((i-2)(cos{2x}-isin{2x}))\, +\, \ C\, \ = \, \frac{1}{10}\ e^x\, \ (sin{2x}-2cos{2x})\, \ + \, \ C <br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]

It now seems to me that complexification works and is effective if an integrand can be rewritten as [itex]Re(e^{\alpha x}[/itex]). Am I correct?
 
HotMintea said:
Hi micromass! :smile:

Thank you for pointing out my mistake and also for the suggestion.

[tex] \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \int\ sin{x}\, \ cos{x}\, \ e^x\ dx\, = \, \frac{1}{2}\int\ sin{2x}\, \ e^x\ dx\, \ = \\ \frac{1}{2}\, \ Re\int\ e^{i(\frac{\pi}{2} - 2x)}\, \ e^x\, \ dx\, = \, \ \frac{1}{2}\ Re(\frac{i}{1-2i}\ e^{(1-2i)x})\, \ + \, \ C\, \ = \\ \frac{1}{10}\ e^x\ Re((i-2)(cos{2x}-isin{2x}))\, +\, \ C\, \ = \, \frac{1}{10}\ e^x\, \ (sin{2x}-2cos{2x})\, \ + \, \ C <br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}[/tex]
In the very last step, you should write 1/5 instead of 1/10. For the rest you are correct.

It now seems to me that complexification works and is effective if an integrand can be rewritten as [itex]Re(e^{\alpha x}[/itex]). Am I correct?

Yes, that's true! :smile:
 
micromass said:
In the very last step, you should write 1/5 instead of 1/10. For the rest you are correct.

1/10 seems correct: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=int+cos%28x%29sin%28x%29e^x+dx&asynchronous=false&equal=Submit

Thanks again for your help! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K