Composite Functions and Exponential Growth

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on composite functions and exponential growth, specifically addressing the rate of spread represented by the equation p'(t) = 5/[e^.5t * (1+10e^(-.5t))^2]. The participant applies the chain rule and product rule to derive the second derivative f''(x) = 6xy'(x^2) + 4(x^3)g''(x^2). Additionally, the horizontal tangent condition dy/dx = 0 leads to the solution x = -π/2, resulting in the coordinates (-π/2, 0) after substitution into the original function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of composite functions
  • Proficiency in calculus, specifically differentiation techniques
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their inverses
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule and product rule in calculus
  • Explore the properties of exponential growth functions
  • Learn about horizontal tangents and their implications in function analysis
  • Investigate the behavior of trigonometric functions and their inverses
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus and function analysis, as well as anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of exponential growth and composite functions.

ardentmed
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Few more questions for the problem set I've been working on. I'm doubting some of my answers and I'd appreciate some help.

Question:
08b1167bae0c33982682_12.jpg


The first one starts off easy but I found that it gets progress more challenging later on. So the rate of spread should be p'(t) which is:

p'(t) = 5/[e^.5t * (1+10e^(-.5t))^2]


As for 1b, I just used chain rule and product rule together to get:

f''(x) = 6xy'(x^2) + 4(x^3)g''(x^2)And finally, for the second question, if the tangent it horizontal, then dy/dx = 0, right?

Therefore, you solve for x, which leads you to:

sinx=-1
x=arcsin(-1)
x= -$\pi$/2


Which leads to ( -$\pi$/2 , 0 ) as the co-ordinates after substituting x = -$\pi$/2 into the original function.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect you have posted the wrong image (containing the questions) here...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K