Composition Factors cyclic IFF finite group soluble

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 3K views
TaliskerBA
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hey, just trying to get my head around the logic of this. I can see that if composition factors are cyclic then clearly the group is soluble, since there exists a subnormal series with abelian factors, but I am struggling to see how the converse holds. If a group is soluble, then it has a subnormal series with abelian factors, and if this is already the composition series then given that the factors are both simple and abelian, they are cyclic. But when refining a series and adding in new "terms", why should the new factors be abelian? I know they are simple if they are in the composition series, but just trying to see why it must be that they are abelian.
 
on Phys.org
Given a solvable group ##G## and a subnormal series ##\{\,0\,\} =G_0 \triangleleft G_1 \triangleleft \ldots \triangleleft G_n=G## with Abelian factors. Now let's look at a refinement, say ##G_i \triangleleft H \triangleleft G_{i+1}##. Then ##H/G_i## is Abelian as a subgroup of the Abelian group ##G_{i+1}/G_i##. But then by the isomorphism theorem ##G_{i+1}/H \cong \left( G_{i+1}/G_i \right)/\left( H/G_i \right)## is also Abelian. By the main theorem of subnormal series, our given series can be refined to a composition series, which must have simple Abelian factors. But simple and Abelian means cyclic of prime order.