Compress Air to Liquid - Is it Possible?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bozo the clown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Compression
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Compressing air can lead to its liquefaction, but this process is complex due to the mixture of gases present, including nitrogen, oxygen, argon, and carbon dioxide, each condensing at different pressures. The temperature of the gas increases during compression due to the kinetic energy of molecules increasing as they collide with the container walls. The relationship between pressure and temperature is governed by the ideal gas law, represented as P1/T1 = P2/T2. Understanding the thermodynamic equilibrium is crucial, as gas particles do not consistently lose kinetic energy upon colliding with the container walls.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ideal gas law (P1/T1 = P2/T2)
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics and kinetic theory
  • Familiarity with gas mixtures and their properties
  • Concept of thermodynamic equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the liquefaction process of gases, focusing on nitrogen and oxygen
  • Study the principles of thermodynamics, particularly the laws governing gas behavior
  • Explore the concept of kinetic energy in gas particles and its implications during compression
  • Learn about the equipment and methods used for compressing gases to achieve liquefaction
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and chemistry, particularly those interested in gas behavior, thermodynamics, and industrial applications of gas liquefaction.

bozo the clown
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
If i compress air enough without altering temparature it will turn to liquid right ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Yes, but air is not a pure substance. The various gases (nitrogen, oxygen, argon, carbon dioxide, water vapor, etc.) will all condense at different pressures.

- Warren
 
Do the gases that make up our air, when compressed, have a tendency to separate, gather, form layers, etc. in some particular way?
 
not in gas form, in liquid form, they probably will form layers since they all have different densities
 
And by the way, for your original question, as you decrease volume (compress), the temperature drops without you having any influence on it except compresing it.
P_1/T_1=P_2/T_2
 
Last edited:
ArmoSkater87 said:
And by the way, for your original question, as you decrease volume (compress), the temperature drops without you having any influence on it except compresing it.
[hex] P_1/T_1 = P_2/T_2 [/hex]

Don't you have that backward? I believe temperature increases as a gass (or an assortment of gasses) is compressed.
 
temperature of the air increases as the volume of the container decreases because the molecules would be traveling faster and bouncing off the sides of the container more frequently.
brownian motion
 
yea...ur right i don't know what i was thinking, i though of it backwards :D
 
does the energy required to compress the air ( say for arguments sake oxygen ) to turn to liquid = the energy required to turn to liquid using temperature alteration
 
  • #10
good question
 
  • #11
jamie said:
temperature of the air increases as the volume of the container decreases because the molecules would be traveling faster and bouncing off the sides of the container more frequently.
brownian motion

If the volume of the container decreases, then the inner surface area of the container decreases in which the molecules rebound. The mass of the molecules is consistent, why does the velocity increase when compression occurs? Shouldn't the velocity actually decrease, because of increased contact with the smaller surface area of the container increases which causes of loss of velocity to the container wall for every rebound a molecule makes? And wouldn't this result in a decrease in temperature?
 
  • #12
Your fundamental mistake is assuming that the gas particles always lose kinetic energy when they hit the walls of the container. They don't. If the walls of the container (say, the metal tank wall) is at the same temperature as the gas, then its molecules have similar kinetic energies. The only difference is that the wall's atoms/molecules are tightly bound to each other and vibrate back and forth rather than flying around freely. Sometimes a collision will transfer some kinetic energy from a gas particle to a particle in the wall; sometimes the opposite will happen. The net result is thermodynamic equilibrium.

If every collision resulted in the gas particle losing energy (and the wall particle gaining it), you'd find that the gas inside any container rapidly approaches absolute zero, while the temperature of the wall rapidly rises. It wouldn't make any sense.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K