Compression of a spring with friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the compression of a spring with friction, focusing on energy conservation principles and the effects of gravitational potential energy. Participants are analyzing the motion of a sledge moving between different heights and surfaces, applying concepts from mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply conservation of energy principles to determine the velocity of the sledge at various points and the maximum compression of the spring. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of potential energy changes and the correct application of formulas. Some participants express uncertainty about specific values and calculations, particularly concerning the velocity at point C.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with multiple participants providing insights and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of energy conservation, but there is no explicit consensus on the values being calculated, particularly the velocity at point C. Several interpretations and calculations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing information in the problem setup, such as unclear problem text and assumptions about reference levels for potential energy. Participants are questioning the accuracy of given values and the implications of friction in the calculations.

Scorpy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi again

I try to solve this by my own with little help from the net, but still I'm not sure if it's the correct!

Here is my work, and please someone tell me if I'm wrong, again. (x = 20,8 m ?)

Thanks

P.S. Here is the full problem http://i.minus.com/j8Fbhtd9CJtCQ.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_00000222.jpg
    IMG_00000222.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 444
  • IMG_00000223.jpg
    IMG_00000223.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 485
  • IMG_00000224.jpg
    IMG_00000224.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 457
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Some parts of the problem text are washed out, and the solution is out of focus. I don't think you want any guesswork on our part, so you should give us something more readable if you need help.
 
voko said:
Some parts of the problem text are washed out, and the solution is out of focus. I don't think you want any guesswork on our part, so you should give us something more readable if you need help.

Here, more readable:

A sledge of mass m=2 kg starts with initial velocity Va=7 m/s at ha=40m. Compute, neglecting friction.
a) the speed Vb at hb=20m

The sledge then travels from C (hc=30m) to D horizontally on a rough surface with uk=0.6.
From D the surface becomes frictionless. In E a spring in equilibrium condition (i.e. neither streched nor compressed) is positioned.
b) Determine the maximum compression of the spring, knowing that CD=20m and the spring constant k=0.2 N/cm.
 
PE+KE=Wf+PEs

mgh + 1/2 mv2= mgμd + 1/2 kx2
Check for zero PE reference level.
Gravitational force is conservative, only levels are relevant not the path between the levels.
 
azizlwl said:
PE+KE=Wf+PEs

mgh + 1/2 mv2= mgμd + 1/2 kx2
Check for zero PE reference level.
Gravitational force is conservative, only levels are relevant not the path between the levels.

So, I take Vc and d as CD?
 
azizlwl said:
PE+KE=Wf+PEs

mgh + 1/2 mv2= mgμd + 1/2 kx2
Check for zero PE reference level.
Gravitational force is conservative, only levels are relevant not the path between the levels.

So, for v I take Vc and for d = CD?
 
Scorpy said:
So, for v I take Vc and for d = CD?
Yes.
 
CAF123 said:
Yes.

And then, the final result is x=7.6m if I'm not wrong again?
 
Can you show your working.
Check the unit of spring constant k.
 
  • #10
Scorpy said:
And then, the final result is x=7.6m if I'm not wrong again?
I get a very similar answer(≈7.7m).
 
  • #11
mgh + 0.5mv2=mgμd+0.5ky2
2x9.8x10 +0.5x2x7x7=2x9.8x0.6x20 + 0.5x0.2/0.01 x y2
196+49 =235.2 +10xy2
9.8=10xy2

y2= 0.98
y=1m
 
  • #12
azizlwl said:
mgh + 0.5mv2=mgμd+0.5ky2
2x9.8x10 +0.5x2x7x7=2x9.8x0.6x20 + 0.5x0.2/0.01 x y2
196+49 =235.2 +10xy2
9.8=10xy2

y2= 0.98
y=1m
Why is h = 10 m and v = 7m/s? I computed the velocity at C to be 15.7m/s and the motion is at a height of 30m. (I took the reference of zero potential at ground level).
 
  • #13
CAF123 said:
Why is h = 10 m and v = 7m/s? I computed the velocity at C to be 15.7m/s and the motion is at a height of 30m. (I took the reference of zero potential at ground level).

As i mentioned on previous reply, it is a conservative force. It is not he path but the different of height that determines the ΔPE. So the ΔPE is height between A and C.
Conservation of energy. The kinetic energy remain the same. As in projectile, the horizontal velocity remains constant.

From point A to C no energy dissipated.

add: If level A equal to level C, do you need to take zero reference at ground level?
 
  • #14
azizlwl said:
As i mentioned on previous reply, it is a conservative force. It is not he path but the different of height that determines the ΔPE. So the ΔPE is height between A and C.
Conservation of energy. The kinetic energy remain the same. As in projectile, the horizontal velocity remains constant.

From point A to C no energy dissipated.

add: If level A equal to level C, do you need to take zero reference at ground level?
Ah of course! But I still don't see why the velocity at C is 7m/s. Can you show this mathematically? I have tried but get values greater than this.
 
  • #15
There are too many steps here that cause errors. Eliminate all the intermediate steps. Start at A and end at E. [itex] (KE + PE)_{initial- at- A} + W_f = (KE + PE)_{final- at -E}[/itex]
Work done by friction is numerically a negative value.
 
  • #16
So, guys, what is the final and also the right result?
 
  • #17
Oh heck you have a good understanding of work energy concepts, so it's just math now for the 2nd part and using g = 10 , then

1/2(2)(7)^2 + (2)(10)(40) + 0 - .6(2)(10)(20) = 0 + 2(10)(30) + 1/2(20)(x^2)

From which x = 1 m.

Which looks like what azizlwl got using a slightly different approach between a different set of points. You should confirm this on your own, as there are lots of ways to skin a cat, as they say.

Oh sorry I didn't pay attention to part A I guess that's solved already.
 
  • #18
Okay, the part a) is just fine, no problem at all with it...
Many thanks to everybody, I hope the answer of 1m is correct :P
 
  • #19
Can anyone enlighten me as to why the velocity at C is 7m/s? Many thanks
 
  • #20
You should confirm it is correct on your own...I didn't take the time pouring through your pages of calcs to see why you arrived at a different answer...maybe too many steps and a number got transposed somewhere... or maybe our answer is wrong you know...:wink:
 
  • #21
CAF123 said:
Can anyone enlighten me as to why the velocity at C is 7m/s? Many thanks

At point A only energy for the system is kinetic energy with velocity of 7m/s.
From point A to point C, gravity has done work on the sledge equal to mgh.
No energy is taken out from the sledge ONLY added work by gravity.

So at Point C we have original energy PLUS energy added by gravity.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
PhanthomJay said:
You should confirm it is correct on your own...I didn't take the time pouring through your pages of calcs to see why you arrived at a different answer...maybe too many steps and a number got transposed somewhere... or maybe our answer is wrong you know...:wink:

I think you think I am the OP :) I just came in and did the question and azizlwl pointed out my error in the way in which I was forgetting to use potential energy. However, I am still unsure of why the velocity at C is 7m/s. Computing it gives a much larger value of about 25m/s. I computed it like: [tex]\frac{1}{2}mv_b^2 + mg(h_A - h_B) = \frac{1}{2}mv_c^2 + mg(h_C-h_B),[/tex] which when using [itex]v_b[/itex]= 21m/s yields [itex]v_c[/itex] as ≈25m/s. (reference of potential, 0 at ground)
See any errors?
Thanks
 
  • #23
CAF123 said:
Can anyone enlighten me as to why the velocity at C is 7m/s? Many thanks
The velocity at C is what you got...15 something m/s...velocity at A is 7 m/s...
 
  • #24
PhanthomJay said:
The velocity at C is what you got...15 something m/s...velocity at A is 7 m/s...
[itex]v_c =[/itex] 15.7m/s was what I got when I did my potential energy contributions incorrect. I now get [itex]v_c =[/itex] 25m/s if my equation is correct that I posted in my previous post.
 
  • #25
CAF123 said:
I think you think I am the OP :) I just came in and did the question and azizlwl pointed out my error in the way in which I was forgetting to use potential energy. However, I am still unsure of why the velocity at C is 7m/s. Computing it gives a much larger value of about 25m/s. I computed it like: [tex]\frac{1}{2}mv_b^2 + mg(h_A - h_B) = \frac{1}{2}mv_c^2 + mg(h_C-h_B),[/tex] which when using [itex]v_b[/itex]= 21m/s yields [itex]v_c[/itex] as ≈25m/s. (reference of potential, 0 at ground)
See any errors?
Thanks
Yes, if you are referencing the ground as 0 PE, then its mg (20) for initial PE at B, and mg(30) for final PE at C. I think you had it right the first go around, Vc is about 15 + m/s.....
 
  • #26
CAF123 said:
I think you think I am the OP :) I just came in and did the question and azizlwl pointed out my error in the way in which I was forgetting to use potential energy. However, I am still unsure of why the velocity at C is 7m/s. Computing it gives a much larger value of about 25m/s. I computed it like: [tex]\frac{1}{2}mv_b^2 + mg(h_A - h_B) = \frac{1}{2}mv_c^2 + mg(h_C-h_B),[/tex] which when using [itex]v_b[/itex]= 21m/s yields [itex]v_c[/itex] as ≈25m/s. (reference of potential, 0 at ground)
See any errors?
Thanks

Energy at A =KEA
Energy at B=KEA + ΔPEAB
Energy at C=KEA + ΔPEAB -ΔPEBC
Energy at C=KEA + ΔPEAC

Error in your total energy at Point B. v=vA not vB and vC should be vB
 
Last edited:
  • #27
PhanthomJay said:
Yes, if you are referencing the ground as 0 PE, then its mg (20) for initial PE at B, and mg(30) for final PE at C. I think you had it right the first go around, Vc is about 15 + m/s.....
Many thanks. I think the reason I might have got confused is because azizlwl might have used a different reference of potential.
Ok, so using the velocity at C to be 15.7m/s, i have: [tex]\frac{1}{2}mv_c^2 + mgh_c = \frac{1}{2}kx^2 + mg\mu(CD)[/tex]. Putting in numbers gives x ≈ 7.7m?
Where is my error?
 
  • #28
azizlwl said:
Energy at A =KEA
Energy at B=KEA + ΔPEAB
Energy at C=KEA + ΔPEAB -ΔPEBC
Energy at C=KEA + ΔPEAC

Error in your total energy at Point B. v=vA not vB
Surely I have some potential energy at A if my reference of potential is the ground?
 
  • #29
CAF123 said:
Surely I have some potential energy at A if my reference of potential is the ground?

Potential energy at a point is meaningless.
It is only relative to other point that count.
When you move to other point, then only either energy is added or reduced.

Energy =FxD
If you apply force, here it not moving, means no energy added or taken out even gravity is available all the time.
 
Last edited:
  • #30
azizlwl said:
Potential energy at a point is meaningless.
It is only relative to other point have a value.
I agree. I measure the potential at various points of the journey with respect to the ground/ relative to the ground.
 

Similar threads

Sliding block hits and compresses a spring
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Question about springs and rotational/translational energy
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Building a Marble Catapult
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Distribution of Energy when work is done on a system of 2 masses connected by a spring
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
How Does Spring Compression Relate to Energy Changes?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
943
Understanding the Forces Behind Part B of the Graph
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Find elastic energy in the compressed spring.
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Why is my method for finding the spring constant incorrect?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Free Body Diagram of Mass-Spring System
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Problem with when to use Force and Energy. What compresses spring/
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K