Compressive force of a shorter cylindrical bone vs a longer one

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparative compressive strength of shorter versus longer cylindrical bones, specifically femurs, under vertical loading. It is established that shorter cylindrical bones are generally more resistant to breaking due to reduced susceptibility to buckling, a failure mode more prevalent in longer specimens. The compressive force required to break a femur is estimated to be around 1000 lbs, with variations noted in studies reporting maximum compressive forces ranging from 400 kg to 5050 kg depending on the specimen's preparation and characteristics. Factors such as bone geometry, wall thickness, and the influence of muscle forces during loading are critical in understanding bone failure mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bone anatomy and structure, particularly the femur.
  • Knowledge of mechanical principles, specifically compressive strength and buckling.
  • Familiarity with experimental setups for biomechanical testing.
  • Basic grasp of material properties and failure modes in biological tissues.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Euler column formula to understand buckling in cylindrical structures.
  • Explore biomechanical testing methods for evaluating bone strength, including hydraulic press applications.
  • Investigate the effects of age and density on bone fragility and compressive strength.
  • Examine the role of muscle forces in bone loading and how they affect fracture risk.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for biomechanical engineers, orthopedic researchers, and medical professionals interested in bone mechanics, fracture analysis, and the design of orthopedic implants.

  • #61
Rev. Cheeseman said:
In order for global buckling to occur, the length-to-diameter ratio needs to be less than 6.
No. You have that backwards.
"In general, to avoid global buckling of galvanized and cold-formed
steel tubes in the structural applications, the L/D ratio needs to be < 6."

Rev. Cheeseman said:
I'm trying to find articles or studies that said the compressive force to break a whole femur is the same as breaking a midshaft only segment but still can't find it.
Probably because it is false.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Baluncore said:
No. You have that backwards.
"In general, to avoid global buckling of galvanized and cold-formed
steel tubes in the structural applications, the L/D ratio needs to be < 6."
Sorry for the mistake. Thank you for noticing. I was rushing when typing and sleepy

Baluncore said:
Probably because it is false.

Sorry, why is it false.
 
  • #63
Rev. Cheeseman said:
Sorry, why is it false.
You are cherry-picking with a search engine.
If it were true, you would expect to find a cherry.
 
  • #64
Baluncore said:
You are cherry-picking with a search engine.
If it were true, you would expect to find a cherry.
Is there a study where they demonstrated the compressive force of whole humeri?
 
  • #65
Rev. Cheeseman said:
Is there a study where they demonstrated the compressive force of whole humeri?
Probably yes.
But finding that research is your problem.
 
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Rev. Cheeseman and Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
869
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
15K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K