Computational neuroscience & neuroinformatics

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding U.S. universities with strong programs in computational neuroscience and neuroinformatics, particularly for a master's student transitioning to graduate school. Key recommendations include UCSD for its overall strength in neuroscience, as well as specific faculty members at institutions like Brandeis, Yale, and Columbia who focus on modeling and large-scale simulations. There is a notable mention of Henry Markram's Blue Brain project, which is considered innovative but perhaps ahead of its time. The conversation highlights the limited focus of computational neuroscientists on functional connectivity and fMRI data, suggesting that cognitive neuroscience groups may offer more relevant opportunities. Notable researchers in cognitive neuroscience, such as Nancy Kanwisher and Emery Brown, are also recommended for their work in statistical analysis related to fMRI. The participant expresses a desire for diverse options, especially since they plan to attend grad school alongside their girlfriend, indicating the need for backup plans.
kangaroo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
i'm finishing my master studies this year (physics) and I'm planning to go into grad school next year. Does anybody know which US universities have strong programs & research in computational neuroscience and neuroinformatics? my current theme of research is brain funcional connectivity (mostly large data sets analysis using complex network methods), but i wouldn't mind to switch into more model-oriented research (i'm mainly interested in large scale simulations)

I know UCSD is quite strong overall in neuroscience, but i don't want it to be my only option, so maybe you guys have heard of other good places.

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what you have in mind for neuroinformatics and connectivity, but maybe: http://www.indiana.edu/~neurosci/sporns.html?

For modelling, perhaps Paul Miller at Brandeis, Xiao-Jing Wang at Yale, Larry Abbott, or Ken Miller, both at Columbia.

Henry Markram is building a blue brain, it's perhaps a little ahead of its time.
 
Last edited:
well, now I'm working with a close sporns collaborator. Trying to find out the relationship between functional and anatomical connectivity based on fmri and dti data seems to be a great deal fun to me.

The thing is - and i haven't said that - i need to search other options because I plan to live with my girlfriend who also is starting grad next year, so just in case that she can't get into indiana or can't find something interesting there i need backup plans. Btw, the whole business of both going together into grad school could have a thread for itself...

anyway, thanks for the info, i'll check out those places (i know some of them, the ones which are actually famous, but i don't want all my options to be at elite university or with elite research groups)
 
kangaroo said:
well, now I'm working with a close sporns collaborator. Trying to find out the relationship between functional and anatomical connectivity based on fmri and dti data seems to be a great deal fun to me.

Wow, that must be fun! I like his work.
 
If you are interested in functional connectivity AKA fMRI data, most computational neuroscience groups aren't working on that... At least not in the United States. The interest in this kind of thing among computational neuroscientists is generally pretty low. Typically when computational neuroscientists have thought about fMRI at all its been either multi-voxel pattern analysis, biophysical models of the BOLD signal or the associated inverse problems. There is a large and impressive group at MGH in Boston working on some of these statistics problems associated with fMRI data analysis... I don't know if these guys would consider themselves "computational neuroscientists" though...

In general, for this kind of work you may also want to join a cognitive neuroscience group. Many of these are very strongly computational (or at least have accommodated people with computational backgrounds in the past). Here's a couple people off the top of my head...

Nancy Kanwisher
Mike Tarr
John Gabrieli
Jody Culham

and many many more. These groups are where the really exciting work in that area is being done in my opinion.

Another group that you might be particularly interested in is Emery Brown's neuroscience statistics laboratory at MIT / MGH. He's a statistician and an anesthesiologist; he's done a lot of very interesting work on the more statistical side of things and collaborates with many other neuroscience groups. He also does fMRI experiments on patients under general anesthesia (which no one else is doing to my knowledge).
 
Yeah, i know computational neuroscientists don't involve themselves too much into neuroimaging issues. But I consider a possible change in my research subject for a ph.d, since I'm already into neuroscience and have some analytical and programming skills, computational neurosciences seems to be a rather fair choice.

i'll check out those labs, thanks again!
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
966
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
810
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K